Will Upcoming Title IX Regulations Codify Right to Cross-Examine Accuser?

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Dec 12, 2019 | 0 Comments

In a recent blog post, we mentioned how some of the details of the upcoming amendments to the regulations surrounding Title IX were being leaked from the Department of Education. Those leaks have given us a glance into what those amendments will be, and how they will change the enforcement of Title IX law.

One of the most important details that has emerged is that the new amendments will explicitly give accused students the right to cross-examine their accusers. Advocates for victims of sexual assault claim that it's a huge setback that must be stopped. But the amendment would only codify accused students' basic due process rights.

Proposed Cross-Examination Rights Seem to Have Survived

Last year, when the Department of Education first set out to roll back the changes to Title IX law that had encouraged sexual assault survivors to come forward, one of the regulations that the Department proposed was a requirement that colleges allow accused students to cross-examine their accusers.

The proposal triggered a strong response from sexual assault survivor advocacy groups. They claimed that these cross-examinations were too traumatic. By forcing victims to relive their experience and having their word challenged in a hearing, fewer victims would come forward. The proposal was one of the most controversial in the Department's overhaul of Title IX law, and some of its critics had hoped that it would be retracted during the comment period.

Leaked details of the soon-to-be-revealed final version of the Title IX amendments, though, suggest that the provisions requiring cross-examination opportunities have survived and will become law.

Guarantee Would Just Codify Currently Recognized Due Process Rights

Advocates for victims of sexual abuse claim that the inclusion of an accused student's right to cross-examine their accuser would be a travesty. It would force victims to relive the trauma of an assault. It would make victims think twice about coming forward. It would be unprecedented.

All of these criticisms ignore the fact that the U.S. Constitution guarantees due process to people who have been accused of wrongdoing. That right to due process gives people accused of wrongdoing the opportunity to defend themselves against the allegations being levied against them.

Federal appeals courts – most notably the 6th Circuit in the case Doe v. Baum – have held that an integral part of those due process rights is the ability of a student accused of sexual misconduct to cross-examine their accuser whenever the case hinges on the credibility of the parties.

Including this right to cross-examination in Title IX law doesn't change the law. The right to cross-examine an accuser in a sexual misconduct case comes from the Constitution.

Title IX Defense Lawyer Joseph D. Lento

Joseph D. Lento is a Title IX defense lawyer and a national Title IX advisor who represents students, faculty members, and college staffers who have been accused of sexual misconduct in violation of Title IX. With his legal representation, you can fight back against the allegations and preserve your future. Contact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience passionately fighting for the futures of his clients. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at universities and colleges across the United States while concurrently fighting in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, and New Jersey. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand universities and colleges across the United States. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website.  In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County.  In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County,  In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties.  Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law.  The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship.  The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.