Sarah Lawrence College

Title IX of the Education Amendments is a federal law that prohibits sexual misconduct in federally funded colleges and universities. Being accused of sexual assault, sexual harassment, rape, or any other form of sexual misconduct at Sarah Lawrence College is a Title IX violation that your school must resolve. If you are found “responsible” for this conduct, you could be exposed to pretty serious repercussions that could jeopardize your plans to graduate. 

For the purposes of this article, we'll address Sarah Lawrence College's disciplinary process and why you need an attorney-advisor if you find yourself in this predicament. 

Sarah Lawrence College's Disciplinary Process

According to Title IX, Sarah Lawrence College is required to adjudicate any cases of sexual misconduct brought to the institution's attention. The Department of Education urges compliant institutions to respond to these accusations in a manner that is prompt and equitable. If the school fails to do so, its federal funding is at stake. Complainants (the reporter of the complaint) and especially respondents (the person accused of sexual misconduct) should understand that their school will approach their case with the utmost seriousness, and each party should follow suit. 

Reporting an Incident

If a person has experienced sexual violence and decides to tell any Sarah Lawrence staff or faculty member, those college faculty and staff members are required to inform the Title IX Coordinator, which will constitute a report under this policy.

Assessment of Intake

After receiving a complaint alleging sexual misconduct, the Title IX coordinator will conduct an initial assessment to evaluate whether it is appropriate to proceed with the College's conduct process. 

The Investigation 

The investigation process will typically include interviews with the complainant and respondent separately and any identified witnesses. The investigator will also gather any available physical evidence, including, but not limited to, documents, communications between the parties, and other electronic records. The investigator will conduct the investigation in a manner appropriate to the circumstances of the case with sensitivity and respect, mindful of individual privacy concerns. At the conclusion of the investigation, the investigator will prepare a written report that summarizes the information gathered, the areas of agreement and disagreement between the parties, and any supporting information. 

The Hearing

Within five days of receiving the final investigatory report, the hearing coordinator will conduct a hearing. This hearing will the order of business listed below:

  1. The hearing coordinator makes introductions of the hearing panel members, the parties and their advisors
  2. The hearing coordinator explains the hearing process and answers any questions related to the process
  3. The reporting individual may, but is not obliged to, make an opening statement in addition to their written statement
  4. The responding individual may, but is not obliged to, make an opening statement in addition to their written statement
  5. The reporting individual answers questions from the hearing panel, and those posed to the hearing coordinator by the responding individual 
  6. The responding individual answers questions from the heating panel, and those posed to the hearing coordinator by the reporting individual
  7. The witness answer questions from the hearing panel and those posed to the hearing coordinator by the reporting individual and responding individual 
  8. The hearing panel may pose further questions to the reporting individual and the responding individual
  9. The reporting individual may, but is not obliged to, make a final statement
  10. The responding individual may, but is not obliged to, make a final statement
  11. The hearing coordinator dismisses all participants

Upon completion of the hearing, the hearing panel will deliberate in private, and outside the presence of the hearing coordinator, to determine if the responding individual was responsible for the violations alleged in each charge.


Both reporting individual and responding individual may appeal the hearing panel's decision. An appeal may be approved on one or more of the following grounds only:

  • A material procedural error made that was significantly prejudicial to the outcome of the hearing as it affects the student appealing
  • Previously unavailable relevant evidence, which was not available or known to the student appealing at the time of the hearing, has arisen, which when considered may materially alter the outcome. Information that the appealing student chose not to pursue or present at the time of the hearing is not considered new information
  • The sanction was substantially disproportionate to the violation in excessiveness or insufficiency

An appeal must be submitted to the hearing coordinator within five days of the receipt of the hearing panel's decision letter. 

New York Title IX Attorney

If you've been accused of sexual misconduct at Sarah Lawrence College, you can anyone to be your advisor in the Title IX process. It would be in your best interest to choose an attorney who can help you effectively navigate the process and build a solid defense for you. Contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today for help at 888-535-3686.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.