Mount Saint Mary College

Title IX of the Education Amendments is a federal law that prohibits sexual misconduct in federally funded colleges and universities. Being accused of sexual assault, sexual harassment, rape, or any other form of sexual misconduct at Mount Saint Mary College is a Title IX violation that your school must resolve. If you are found “responsible” for this conduct, you could be exposed to pretty serious repercussions that could jeopardize your plans to graduate. 

For the purposes of this article, we'll address Mount Saint Mary College's disciplinary process and why you need an attorney-advisor if you find yourself in this predicament. 

Mount Saint Mary College's Disciplinary Process

Under Title IX, Mount Saint Mary College is required to adjudicate any cases of sexual misconduct brought to the institution's attention. The Department of Education urges compliant higher education institutions to respond to these accusations in a manner that is prompt and equitable. If the school fails to do so, its federal funding is at stake. Complainants (the reporter of the complaint) and especially respondents (the person accused of sexual misconduct) should understand that their school will approach their case with the utmost seriousness, and each party should follow suit. 

Reporting and Response

Individuals wishing to report incidents of sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and/or stalking have the right to pursue more than one reporting action. You could contact the Director of Counseling, the Director of Campus Ministry, or a Counselor.

The complaint should describe the relevant dates, times, places, names of persons involved, and the nature of the alleged event, as well as the names and contact information of any potential witnesses.

The Investigation

A college official who is trained in interviewing victims of sexual assault will talk to the complainant, the respondent, and any witnesses to gather facts and preserve evidence. 

Student Conduct Hearing

The Director of Human Resources shall chair a hearing board that includes a faculty member and an administrator/staff member, chosen from a pool of trained individuals. They will be responsible for conducting the student conduct hearing. After all statements are heard and questions are answered, the board will deliberate and come up with a determination.

Both complainant and respondent shall be notified concurrently in writing of the outcome of the hearing within a reasonably prompt timeframe after receipt of the complaint. 


Both parties have a right to appeal the determination and/or sanction(s). An appeal panel will review the appeal request(s). An appeal must be made based on at least one of the following grounds:

  • A procedural error occurred during the process that had a direct impact on the outcome
  • New evidence has come to light that has a direct impact on the outcome which could not have been discovered by a properly diligent person before or during the original proceeding
  • The sanction is too severe (appeal from respondent), or the sanction is too lenient (appeal from complainant)

Students must submit an appeal to the Vice President for Students within six business days of receipt of determination. 

New York Title IX Attorney

If you've been accused of sexual misconduct at Mount Saint Mary College, you can choose anyone to be your advisor in the Title IX process. Since this is a religious institution, the rules are a bit different from public schools. Therefore, it would be in your best interest to choose an attorney who can help you effectively navigate the process and build a solid defense for you. Contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today for help at 888-535-3686.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.