Arcadia University Title IX Violations

Arcadia University takes extra care in resolving instances of sexual misconduct that arise within its student body. The University's Sexual Misconduct Policy is upheld and enforced by the Title IX Coordinator. Acts of sexual misconduct are treated with the utmost seriousness and have their own dedicated process for resolutions.

Arcadia University Disciplinary Process

When a violation is reported to the Office of the Title IX Coordinator, the Office launches an investigation and resolution process. When a student files a complaint, they will be known throughout all procedures as the "complainant," while the student who is the subject of the complaint will be known as the "respondent." Depending on the case and what the investigation uncovers, the University may deem it necessary to impose certain interim measures on a respondent, if it is believed that the respondent poses a threat to the complainant, the community, or the overall investigation. These interim measures can include a change in class scheduling, relocation from residence halls, temporary suspension, or even a University-wide no-contact directive. The first step that the Investigative Team will take is to have meetings with both the complainant and respondent, separately, to instruct them on the overall process.

Hearings

First, both complainant and respondent will have to attend a pre-hearing meeting. These meetings are individual discussions with the Title IX Coordinator and the Dean of Students meant to educate both parties on the hearing process.

Hearings will either be an Administrative Hearing or a full Judicial Board hearing. Administrative hearings are used when both parties, as well as the Dean of Students, agree to resolve the matter in this manner. These hearings are less formal and are resolved by the decision of the Dean of Students using the standard of "a preponderance of evidence."

Judicial Board Hearings are more formal in nature. Hearings will be decided upon by the Judicial Board, and led by the Chair of the Board. Hearings begin with an Investigator presenting facts of the investigation, and all parties, including the Board members, may ask questions in response. Next, the complainant will make their case. This includes an opening statement and a summary of their view of the events. Following this, the respondent will have the same opportunity. Both parties will be able to question the other, however, the questioning must be done indirectly through the Chair. Afterward, the witnesses will be called. Both parties may submit their questions to the Chair, who will present the questions. Finally, the board, complainant, and respondent may pose final questions to the investigator, and present their own concluding statement. After this, the Board will deliberate and make a decision using the standard of "a preponderance of the evidence."

At hearings, respondents are allowed to have the presence of an advisor. Sexual misconduct allegations are very serious charges, and the University will investigate with particular scrutiny. These allegations can also bring about serious negative consequences for a student's academic and career goals. For this reason, students should select an attorney to serve as their advisor at hearings and throughout the Title IX investigative process. Attorneys can provide insight into courtroom strategies and techniques that can strongly influence the outcome of a hearing. In addition, if any additional adverse circumstances accompany or follow the allegations at Arcadia University, attorneys will be able to guide students through them.

Appeals at Arcadia University

In the event of an unfavorable outcome, students are offered a chance at an appeal. Appeals must be submitted within five (5) business days of the outcome. The grounds for an appeal are either new evidence or procedural error.

If you or your student is facing Title IX charges or allegations of sexual misconduct at Arcadia University, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!

Footer 2

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu