Pratt Institute

Title IX of the Education Amendments is a federal law that prohibits sexual misconduct in federally funded colleges and universities. Being accused of sexual assault, sexual harassment, rape, or any other form of sexual misconduct at Pratt Institute is a Title IX violation that your school must resolve. If you are found “responsible” for this conduct, you could be exposed to pretty serious repercussions that could jeopardize your plans to graduate.

For the purposes of this article, we'll address Pratt Institute's disciplinary process and why you need an attorney-advisor if you find yourself in this predicament.

Pratt Institute's Disciplinary Process

According to Title IX, Pratt Institute is required to adjudicate any cases of sexual misconduct brought to the institution's attention. The Department of Education urges compliant higher education institutions like Pratt Institute to respond to these accusations in a manner that is prompt and equitable. If the institute fails to do so, its federal funding is at stake. Complainants (the reporter of the complaint) and especially respondents (the person accused of sexual misconduct) should understand that their school will approach their case with the utmost seriousness, and each party should follow suit.

File a Complaint

Complaints of sexual misconduct may be made verbally or in writing to the Title IX Coordinator. The complaint is to include the names of the people involved, the names of witnesses, a detailed description of the alleged conduct, when and where the conduct occurred, and relevant evidence of correspondence (text messages, emails, social media, etc).

There is no statute of limitations with respect to filing a complaint of an alleged incident. However, complainants are encouraged to report a violation as soon as possible.

Intake Meeting

Upon notice of any complaint of sexual misconduct, a Title IX Coordinator will schedule an intake meeting with the complainant within one business day of receiving notice. At this meeting, the coordinator is tasked with seeking to determine how the complainant will wish to proceed, and whether he or she will pursue formal resolution or informal resolution (not available for complaints of sexual violence), or does not wish to pursue resolution of any kind.

Formal Resolution

The formal resolution process consists of three phases: 1) fact-finding, 2) adjudication, and 3) determination.

During the fact-finding phase, an investigator will interview all parties involved and comprise a finding. During the adjudication process, a Title IX Coordinator will appoint a trained adjudicator to conduct a hearing. One part of the determination phase is the hearing. The hearing entails statements made by the complainant, respondent, and witnesses and a questioning period for clarification. The other part of the determination phase is the actual decision. Based on the preponderance of evidence standard, the hearing panel will determine if the respondent violated the policy.


Either party may appeal the determination of the Adjudicator and/or the disciplinary decision of the Vice President for Student Affairs. Students havefive business days of the date the party is notified of the adjudicator's findings. A party has three grounds under which to appeal the Institute's determination:

  • There was a procedural error.
  • There is new evidence that was not reasonably available at the time of the hearing.
  • The sanctions aren't consistent with past practices or the severity of the alleged misconduct.

New York Title IX Attorney

If you've been accused of sexual misconduct at Pratt Institute, you can choose anyone to be your advisor in the Title IX process. It would be in your best interest to choose an attorney who can help you effectively navigate the process and build a solid defense for you. Contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today at 888-535-3686 for help.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.