University of Wisconsin System Student Misconduct Charges

University of Wisconsin System Campuses

The vast University of Wisconsin System, established under Wis. Stat. Chapter 36, claims thirteen universities spread across twenty-six campuses, enrolling over 174,000 students, and employing about 39,000 faculty and staff members. Wisconsin's legislature formed the UW System in 1971 out of two former University of Wisconsin and Wisconsin State University systems, each with a hundred-plus-year-old history. The UW System's flagship campus is UW-Madison, in the state's capitol. But the UW System also boasts campuses in Eau Claire, Green Bay, La Crosse, Milwaukee, Oshkosh, Parkside, Platteville, River Falls, Stevens Point, Stout, Superior, and Whitewater. Several of those UW System universities sport more than one campus. Together, the campuses give the UW System a statewide presence and reach, reinforced by a UW System extension service. Attending any UW System campus makes you a part of a powerful and sophisticated public institution of higher education.

As a UW System student, you have every reason to be proud of your institution, even if you have the misfortune of facing UW System misconduct charges. National college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento knows the high regard in which employers and the public hold UW System universities. Attorney Lento also knows the threat that misconduct charges pose to your enjoying the benefits of a UW System degree. Don't let misconduct charges discourage you from pursuing your dream of earning a UW System degree. Retain national college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento to help you preserve your UW System education and enjoy its full, lifelong benefit.

University of Wisconsin System Impact

The University of Wisconsin System has the resources and impact of one of the nation's largest and most influential public statewide systems. The UW System's annual budget is on the order of $6 billion, $1 billion of which comes in the form of state funding, with another $1.9 billion in gifts, grants, and contracts. Tuition revenue makes up only approximately one-half of the UW System's annual budget. The enormous UW System brings huge economic benefit to Wisconsin, estimated to be in the neighborhood of $24 billion annually. And of course, the UW System doesn't just employ tens of thousands of individuals and generate income to support businesses employing tens of thousands more. The UW System also awards tens of thousands of degrees annually, opening doors to careers that will collectively earn its graduates billions more.

As a UW System student, you are preparing to join those graduates in a satisfying and potentially lucrative career, even if UW System misconduct charges now stand in your way of realizing that laudable dream and ambition. The sheer size, obvious sophistication, and enormous influence of the UW System shouldn't discourage you from trusting in your capacity and opportunity to complete your UW education and graduate with a UW System degree. Just because the UW System has enormous resources and impact doesn't mean that its misconduct charges will inevitably result in dismissal or other serious discipline. With the skilled representation of national college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento, you can ensure that the UW System treats you fairly. You can defeat false, unfair, or exaggerated misconduct charges. Trust national college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento to help you preserve and pursue your educational goal and career dream.

University of Wisconsin System Mission

Every higher education system has its own mission. Consistent with Wis. Stat. Section 36.01 defining the University of Wisconsin System's purpose, the UW System focuses its mission on developing human resources. That mission means preparing you for a fruitful career. The UW System's mission statement includes other commitments typical of public university systems, things like discovering and disseminating knowledge and serving society by fostering scientific, professional, and technological expertise. The UW System's mission statement also acknowledges the search for truth as basic to every other aspect of its mission. But the UW System places you first among its commitments when it lists developing human resources as its first mission.

When you enrolled at a UW System campus, you clearly expected to advance your education and expertise both to benefit you and society. According to its mission statement, the UW System shares that commitment to you, even if you currently face UW System misconduct charges. Your effective defense of those charges may, more than anything, entail reminding the UW System of its commitment to your success. National college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento knows how to hold the UW System accountable to its commitment to you and your education. The UW System isn't a judicial system bent on punishment. The UW System is a proud public institution of higher education. Students facing serious UW System misconduct charges, risking their dismissal or suspension, need the skilled advocacy of national college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento to remind the UW System of its commitment to education.

The Worth of a University of Wisconsin System Degree

A University of Wisconsin System degree can have great value to you, as UW System degrees have had such value to others. A UW System degree is worth the investment. The UW System's president recently listed these reasons why you and other UW System students are wise when investing in a UW System degree:

  • College graduates with a bachelor's degree on average earn about $1 million more over the course of a career than those with only a high school diploma
  • Nearly all job growth over the past fifteen years has involved jobs requiring at least an undergraduate college degree
  • The number of jobs requiring at least an undergraduate college degree remained stable during the last major recession, while the nation lost over six million jobs requiring only a high school diploma, with most of those lost jobs never coming back
  • The UW System's world-class reputation opens doors to employment, especially within Wisconsin but also across the nation and around the world
  • A UW System degree is more affordable than the national average and more affordable than all peer systems in the Midwest
  • A UW System degree can help you contribute to the economy of your local community in Wisconsin or elsewhere, benefitting not only you and your family but others in your community

Facing UW System misconduct charges may cause you to question whether pursuing and completing your UW System degree remains worth your investment. But the reasons why you attended a UW System institution likely haven't truly changed. Certainly, the larger picture of the potential economic, social, and personal benefits of a UW System degree hasn't changed just because of your individual misconduct charges, as daunting as those charges may be. Don't question why you went to school. Your challenge is instead to focus on the best actions and strategies to preserve or regain your good standing so that you can graduate with your UW System degree. And the best action you can take is to retain national college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento to help you defend and defeat the charges. Don't doubt the great value of a UW System degree. Instead, get the expert academic attorney help you need.

The Risk of University of Wisconsin System Charges

At the same time that students facing UW System misconduct charges need to retain their confidence that they can continue with their education, students facing charges must also take those charges seriously. While the best strategy is to get the expert academic attorney help that you need, the worst approach is to ignore or minimize the risk of the charges. Ignoring or minimizing charges could result in your default and discipline right up to suspension and dismissal, costing you everything you have invested in your UW System education. Lesser forms of discipline like cautions, warnings, reprimands, probation, extra work, repeated courses or repeated assignments, reduced grades, and loss of honors, awards, references, and recommendations can carry their own serious impacts. Internship sites, licensing boards, employers, and others may require graduates to disclose any form of discipline, which could cost the applicant the best opportunities. Take any misconduct charge seriously. Your education, reputation, and career could be on the line. Retain national college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento to help you defend and defeat the charges.

University of Wisconsin System Administration

Under Wis. State Section 36.09 and related law, an eighteen-member Board of Regents governs the University of Wisconsin System. The Board of Regents enacts the UW System's policies and rules. The Board of Regents also establishes the regulatory framework within which UW System universities and their units must operate to comply with UW System policies and rules and other laws, rules, and regulations. The Board of Regents also appoints a president over the UW System and a chancellor over each of the UW System's thirteen universities. The president and chancellors then implement the Board of Regents' policies and rules across the UW System. The UW System administration has its own mission statement in which it commits to close coordination of the implementation of the rules and regulations of UW System universities. Wis. State Section 36.09(5) grants students at UW campuses generous rights over certain aspects of student life but is subject to the powers of the UW System president and chancellors. If you face UW System misconduct charges, don't question the chancellor's authority to designate officials to file and pursue those charges. Instead, retain national college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento to help you defend and defeat those charges.

University of Wisconsin System Discipline Authority

UW System student conduct rules and procedures begin with centralized authority. In Wis. Stat. Section 36.35, the Wisconsin legislature requires the UW System Board of Regents to “promulgate rules … governing student conduct and procedures for the administration of violations.” While the UW System Board of Regents has the statutory authority to prescribe student misconduct rules and procedures, Wis. Stat. Section 36.35 specifically authorizes the Board of Regents to delegate that power to suspend or expel students for misconduct. Thus, the central Board of Regents shares its student conduct powers with the chancellors and other officials at each UW System university. If you face misconduct charges at a UW System campus, then you should expect central Board of Regents rules and procedures to govern those charges but to see those rules and procedures implemented by local campus officials.

UW Board of Regents Student Conduct Codes

The UW System Board of Regents has exercised its statutory authority and responsibility over student conduct by adopting two primary codes. Because the UW System Board of Regents is a state agency, the UW System student conduct codes take the form of state regulations codified in the Wisconsin Administrative Code. The Board of Regents directs one regulatory code toward student academic misconduct and the other code toward student non-academic misconduct. The Board of Regents' non-academic misconduct code divides itself into two sections. The first section of the non-academic misconduct code is on non-sexual misconduct, while the second section is on sexual misconduct. The division of non-academic misconduct into sexual and non-sexual forms helps the UW System comply with federal Title IX regulations on sexual misconduct.

Thus, the UW System charges you face and the codes and procedures governing those charges, depending on the kind of misconduct in which your UW System campus believes you may have engaged. UW System procedures for non-academic misconduct differ from the academic misconduct procedures. And the sexual misconduct procedures differ from the non-sexual misconduct procedures. Don't underestimate the significance of these procedures and their differences. Knowing and following the correct procedures while putting them to your best advantage can be critical to the outcome of your charges. National college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento is available at your UW System campus to defend against any form of charge, whether academic or non-academic, and whether involving alleged sexual or non-sexual misconduct.

UW System Academic Misconduct

The UW System's academic misconduct code begins with a statement of principles that academic integrity is critical to the UW System's proper functioning. The statement of principles holds, “Students are responsible for the honest completion and representation of their work, for the appropriate citation of sources, and for respect of others' academic endeavors.” The code then defines these forms of academic misconduct when a student:

  • Claims credit for the work or efforts of another without authorization or citation
  • Uses unauthorized materials or fabricated data in any academic exercise
  • Forges or falsifies academic documents or records
  • Intentionally impedes or damages the academic work of others
  • Engages in conduct aimed at making false representation of a student's academic performance
  • Assists other students in any of these acts

The UW System's academic misconduct code does not further define these common forms of academic misconduct. Any conduct falling within these broad statements could potentially result in academic misconduct charges. The code does, however, provide these non-exclusive examples of academic misconduct:

  • “Cheating on an examination
  • Collaborating with others in work to be presented, contrary to the stated rules of the course
  • Submitting a paper or assignment as one's own work when a part or all of the paper or assignment is the work of another
  • Submitting a paper or assignment that contains ideas or research of others without appropriately identifying the sources of those ideas
  • Stealing examinations or course materials
  • Submitting, if contrary to the rules of a course, work previously presented in another course
  • Tampering with the laboratory experiment or computer program of another student
  • Knowingly and intentionally assisting another student in any of the above, including assistance in an arrangement whereby any work, classroom performance, examination, or other activity is submitted or performed by a person other than the student under whose name the work is submitted or performed”

If you face UW System academic misconduct charges alleging any of these forms of academic misconduct, or other forms, retain national college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento to help you evaluate, defend, and defeat the charges. An academic misconduct charge is not the same thing as a finding of academic misconduct. A charge is simply an allegation. Allegations are often mistaken, exaggerated, reasonably disputed, or without basis. Academic misconduct allegations may also fall outside of the actual scope of the UW System academic misconduct code. You need an expert academic attorney to help you understand, evaluate, and contest academic misconduct charges. Retain national college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento to help ensure that you don't fall victim to false, exaggerated, or unfair academic misconduct charges.

UW System Academic Misconduct Sanctions

Like other colleges and universities, UW System universities have authority under the UW System's academic misconduct code to impose a wide range of penalties for academic misconduct. Those penalties progress from minor to modest to severe. The UW System's academic misconduct code permits UW System disciplinary officials to impose any one of the penalties, or any combination of the penalties, without specifying the kinds of academic misconduct to which any of the penalties may apply. In other words, any academic misconduct could potentially result in any form of discipline up to and including expulsion. The penalties available to UW System administrators to punish academic misconduct include:

  • Oral reprimand
  • Written reprimand presented only to the student
  • An assignment to repeat the work, graded on its merits
  • A reduced or failing grade on the particular assignment or test
  • A reduced or failing grade in the course
  • The student removal from the course while in progress
  • Written reprimand included in the student's disciplinary file
  • Disciplinary probation
  • Suspension
  • Expulsion from the university

If you face UW System academic misconduct charges, don't take those charges lightly, no matter how minor they may appear. Remember that the UW System academic misconduct code does not specify the discipline that applies to any specific form of misconduct. You could potentially suffer crippling suspension or expulsion for any academic misconduct. Indeed, suspension, not simply reprimand or having to redo an assignment or retake an exam, is the default academic misconduct discipline at many colleges and universities. Retain national college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento if you face UW System academic misconduct charges.

UW System Academic Misconduct Procedures

Private Discipline. UW System Board of Regents procedures for determining academic misconduct and imposing discipline differ depending on the level of discipline imposed. Under Wis. Admin. Code Section UWS 14.05, the instructor may reprimand the student to the student only, without transcript entry or other school record, and require the student to repeat coursework, simply by promptly offering to discuss the matter with the student. The student may appeal the discipline to an academic misconduct hearing committee. Few students would appeal, given the prospect of losing the appeal and leaving a record of the otherwise private and minor discipline. Preparing for and attending the hearing would also likely entail more time, effort, and stress than repeating the coursework. Invoking a formal hearing over having to repeat coursework would ordinarily make little sense.

Graduated Discipline. Instructors may also impose more-serious discipline, short of probation, suspension, or expulsion. UW System Board of Regents procedures for determining academic misconduct become more elaborate when the instructor wishes to reduce a grade or give a failing grade on an assignment or test, reduce a grade or give a failing grade in the course, remove the student from the course, or enter a written reprimand in the student's disciplinary file. In those cases, under Wis. Admin. Code Section UWS 14.06, the instructor must submit a written report to the UW System campus's student affairs officer and any others whom the campus designates. The report must describe the misconduct, specify the sanction, notify the student of the right to request a formal hearing before an academic misconduct hearing committee within ten days, and provide a copy of the hearing rules.

While these forms of moderate discipline may appear relatively minor, they can, in certain cases, have much more serious impacts. Grade reductions or failing grades can lower a student's grade point average below minimum standards, resulting in probation, suspension, or even dismissal. Failing grades can affect a student's satisfactory academic progress, resulting in the same severe penalties. Grade reductions and failing grades also impact class standing and can affect scholarships, honors, awards, and opportunities to gain admission to internships and graduate school. They can even affect job opportunities. If you face false, unfair, or exaggerated UW System academic misconduct charges threatening these types of losses, don't face the charge on your own. Instead, retain national college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento to help you timely invoke a formal hearing and to defend and defeat the charge.

Probation, Suspension, or Expulsion. UW System instructors who observe suspected academic misconduct may also recommend probation, suspension, or expulsion. In those cases, though, Wis. Admin. Code Section UWS 14.07 requires that a campus officer investigate the instructor's written report. The investigating officer must first discuss the charges with the accused student and the complaining instructor. The investigating officer may dismiss the charge if the investigation reveals that no misconduct occurred. If, on the other hand, evidence indicates that the accused student committed misconduct, then the investigating officer must prepare a written report describing the misconduct and sanction and notifying the student of the right to a formal hearing before the academic misconduct hearing committee. If the sanction is probation, suspension, or expulsion, a hearing is automatic. The student must request a hearing within ten days if the sanction is less than probation, suspension, or expulsion. Failure to make a timely request results in the sanction. Retain national college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento to help you evaluate your UW System academic misconduct charges and your procedural rights to contest those charges and any recommended sanction.

UW System Academic Misconduct Hearings

UW System students accused of serious academic misconduct, and facing probation, suspension, or expulsion, have the right to a formal hearing before an academic misconduct hearing committee. A UW System formal hearing gives the accused student a substantial opportunity to disprove misconduct charges. Wis. Admin. Code Section UWS 14.08 requires the hearing to take place within ten days unless the sides agree to extend that date. The complaining instructor or investigating officer must give the hearing committee and accused student a full written explanation of the charges reasonably in advance of the hearing, giving the accused student and the student's expert attorney representative time to prepare.

The hearing rules expressly permit the student to retain a representative to attend the hearing. The rules do not expressly limit the representative's participation in the hearing, as hearing rules at many other colleges and universities do. The hearing committee must permit the student to present witnesses and other evidence in defense and must permit the student to question adverse witnesses, presumably with the representative's assistance. This right of cross-examination ensures that the student can challenge testimony that lacks a factual basis or indicates witness bias or interest. Most significantly, the hearing committee may impose suspension or expulsion only on clear and convincing evidence of misconduct. Few colleges and universities accept that higher proof burden, giving UW System students facing serious academic misconduct charges a large procedural advantage. Retain national college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento to help you put that advantage to work in your defense.

UW System Academic Misconduct Appeals

UW System students facing serious academic misconduct charges have other procedural protections. A UW System academic misconduct hearing committee that finds grounds for probation, suspension, or expulsion must prepare written findings of fact supporting the discipline. The hearing committee must also record the hearing and preserve evidence presented at the hearing. Students who suffer discipline and wish to appeal may order the hearing record for an appeal. Wis. Admin. Code Section UWS 14.09 provides that appeals go to the UW System campus's chancellor, the highest official on campus. Appeals, though, require proof of one of these three grounds:

  • The evidence does not support the findings and recommendations of the hearing committee
  • The academic misconduct hearing committee did not follow the prescribed procedures, resulting in material prejudice to the student
  • The hearing committee based the decision on factors proscribed by state or federal law regarding equal educational opportunities

Your UW System campus chancellor has the authority to overturn academic discipline, send the case back for a new hearing before a different committee, or adjust the sanction, on any of these three grounds. Yet UW System chancellors do not lightly reverse the findings of their academic misconduct hearing committees, composed of faculty and staff colleagues whom the chancellor likely holds in high esteem. Academic appeals require the skills of an expert academic administrative attorney. An effective appeal requires the attorney to obtain the hearing transcript, examine the transcript for solid appeal grounds, marshal transcript citations and exhibit evidence supporting those appeal grounds, and draft a compelling appeal brief. A second appeal may even be possible. Wis. Admin. Code Section 14.10 grants the UW System Board of Regents discretion to review a sanction. If you face unfair or unsupported UW System academic misconduct discipline after a formal hearing, retain national college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento to assist you with a UW System appeal.

UW System Non-Academic Misconduct

The UW System provides uniform procedures across all of its campuses for non-academic misconduct charges. The UW System also adopts policies defining non-academic misconduct across all campuses, while giving each member institution latitude to adopt additional consistent policies. In Wis. Admin. Code Section UWS 17.01, the UW System Board of Regents provides that each member institution must ensure that campuses “are safe and free from violence, harassment, fraud, theft, disruption and intimidation.” Wis. Admin. Code Section UWS 17.03 then provides that each UW System institution may define its own non-academic misconduct standards consistent with Board of Regents policies. You must look first to those UW System policies but may also find additional policies adopted for your own UW System member university. The UW System prohibits these forms of non-academic misconduct:

  • Dangerous conduct, defined as conduct that threatens the health or safety of oneself or another person
  • Harassment, as defined in the disorderly conduct criminal statute Wis. Stat. 947.013
  • Hazing, as defined in Wis. Stat. 948.51
  • Illegal use, possession, manufacture, or distribution of alcoholic beverages or of marijuana, narcotics, or other controlled substances
  • “Unauthorized possession of, use of, moving of, tampering with, damage to, or destruction of university property or the property of others
  • Disruption of university-authorized activities”
  • Conduct that interferes with or impedes the ability of a person to participate in university-run or university-authorized activities
  • “Unauthorized possession of or fraudulent creation, alteration, or misuse of any university or other governmental document, record, key, electronic device, or identification”
  • Misuse of computing resources including failure to comply with laws, license agreements, and contracts governing university computer network, software, and hardware use, use of university computing resources for unauthorized commercial purposes or personal gain, failure to protect a personal password or university-authorized account, or breach of computer security, invasion of privacy, or unauthorized access to university computing resources
  • “Making a knowingly false oral or written statement to any university employee or agent of the university regarding a university matter or refusal to comply with a reasonable request on a university matter
  • Conduct that constitutes a criminal offense as defined by state or federal law”
  • Serious and repeated off-campus violations of municipal law
  • Violating UW system provisions regulating fire safety, theft, and dangerous weapons
  • “Conduct that violates any published university rules, regulations, or policies”
  • Noncompliance with disciplinary sanctions
  • Intimidation, threats, coercion, or discrimination against any individual for the purpose of interfering with any university right or privilege, or because the individual has made a report or complaint, testified, assisted, or participated or refused to participate in any manner in a disciplinary investigation, proceeding, or hearing

In a separate policy, Wis. Admin. Code Section UWS 17.151, the UW System prohibits several forms of sexual misconduct. The UW System's sexual misconduct prohibitions satisfy federal Title IX requirements. But the UW System's sexual prohibitions go beyond Title IX's reach to include non-Title IX sexual misconduct. The UW System prohibits these forms of Title IX and non-Title IX sexual misconduct:

  • Sexual harassment, defined as unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature that a reasonable person would regard as so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it denies the person equal access to education programs or activities or that has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual's academic or work performance or participation in a university-sponsored or supported activity
  • Sexual assault in the form of rape, fondling, incest, or statutory rape, as state law defines those crimes
  • Dating violence in a social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature
  • Domestic violence, as federal regulations or state law defines it
  • Stalking, defined as “engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear for their safety or the safety of others or suffer substantial emotional distress”
  • Sexual exploitation, including taking or threatening non-consensual sexual advantage of another person by observing, recording, or photographing private body parts or sexual activity of one or more complainants, allowing another person to do so, or distributing recordings, photographs, or other images of the same, inappropriate touching, voyeurism, deception regarding the use of contraceptives or condoms during the course of sexual activity, inducing incapacitation to make another person vulnerable to non-consensual sexual activity, coercing sexual activity for money or anything of value, or threatening distribution of any photos, videos, or recordings depicting private body parts or sexual activity of one or more persons, for money or other advantage

UW System Non-Academic Misconduct Procedures

Your UW System university and campus should follow uniform UW System non-academic misconduct procedures for addressing and deciding non-academic misconduct charges. Those procedures, stated in Wis. Admin. Code Chapter UWS 17, first provides for notice to the accused student of any discipline charges. You should know in advance of any potential discipline for non-academic misconduct. The procedures then require the campus to designate an investigating officer. In Title IX sexual misconduct cases, the Title IX coordinator or designee is the investigating officer. The procedures then provide for the designation of a hearing examiner and hearing committee. The procedures also state that misconduct charges may reach not only conduct occurring on campus but also off-campus conduct at university-sponsored events or when that off-campus conduct affects a substantial university interest. Students who commit serious criminal offenses off-campus, present a danger to students, or exhibit a behavior pattern interfering with university functions may face discipline no matter where or when the misconduct occurs.

Non-Sexual Misconduct Procedures. UW System non-academic misconduct procedures differ depending on whether the charge involves sexual misconduct. For non-sexual misconduct charges, if the proposed sanction is anything less than probation, suspension, or expulsion, the campus's investigating officer must prepare a report describing the alleged misconduct and sanction, notifying the student of the right to contest the charge at a formal hearing, and including the rules for hearing. If the student accepts the report, then the campus imposes the sanction. If the student rejects the report, or if the proposed sanction involves probation, suspension, or expulsion, then the matter proceeds to a formal hearing. The student may retain an attorney advisor to counsel and otherwise assist the student at the hearing. But only the student, not the attorney advisor, may present witnesses and arguments in defense and question adverse witnesses. Appeals from adverse decisions are possible under rules similar to those for academic misconduct. Don't underestimate the value of an expert academic administrative attorney in and outside of these hearings. Retain national college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento to assist you.

Sexual Misconduct Procedures. UW System sexual misconduct procedures provide all the above protections with additional protections that federal Title IX regulations require. Wis. Admin. Code Section 17.152 ensures that the UW student accused of sexual misconduct may retain an attorney to cross-examine adverse witnesses at the formal hearing. Pre-hearing procedures for sexual misconduct charges are more extensive, ensuring that the accused student can review, comment on, and supplement investigation findings well in advance of the hearing. The hearing committee may only consider the testimony of witnesses who appear at the hearing subject to the accused student's attorney's cross-examination. Appeals from adverse decisions are possible in a form similar to the academic misconduct procedures described above. Sexual misconduct charges are always serious, given the health and safety issues they raise and their reputational harm. Retain national college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento to help you defend and defeat UW System sexual misconduct charges.

UW System Non-Academic Misconduct Sanctions

UW System sanctions for non-academic misconduct are progressive in nature, from minor corrective sanctions right up to suspension or expulsion. When facing the possibility of non-academic misconduct sanctions, don't underestimate the risk of serious sanctions like probation, suspension, or expulsion that would obviously interfere with or curtail your UW System education. And don't underestimate the potentially severe impact of minor sanctions as they may interfere with honors, awards, scholarships, admission to other programs, transfer, and other substantial rights and interests. Retain national college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento to help you evaluate, defend, and defeat non-academic misconduct charges. Wis. Admin. Code Section UWS 17.085 authorizes these sanctions for non-academic misconduct:

  • Written reprimand
  • Denial of university privileges
  • Restitution
  • Additional education
  • Community service
  • Probation
  • Terms and conditions on continued student status
  • Removal from a course in progress
  • Restrictions on course or program enrollment
  • Suspension
  • Expulsion

Alternative Relief Within the University of Wisconsin System

If you have already suffered UW System discipline, you may still have the chance for relief from that discipline. The UW System, like other university systems, maintains a general counsel's office and similar oversight offices. National college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento has helped students nationwide gain special administrative relief from those oversight offices or their retained outside counsel. Attorney Lento can help you determine whether special relief is available to you at your UW System member institution.

Premier College Misconduct Defense Attorney Available

National college misconduct defense attorney Joseph Lento is available to help you at your UW System member institution. Don't retain a local criminal defense attorney who lacks academic administrative knowledge, skill, and experience. Instead, retain an expert academic administrative attorney who can help you. Attorney Lento and the expert team at the Lento Law Firm have helped hundreds of students nationwide defend and defeat college and university misconduct charges. Call 888-535-3686 to schedule a consultation or use the online service.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.