Thomas Edison State College Title IX Violations

Thomas Edison State University takes a firm stance against students who are alleged to have committed sexual misconduct offenses. The University outlines its stance in its Title IX policy. The University will pursue disciplinary action against a student using the same method as standard behavioral violations.

Thomas Edison University Disciplinary Process

Thomas Edison State College uses its Nonacademic Code of Conduct when dealing with students who are reported for allegations of sexual misconduct. The disciplinary process begins when a complaint is filed against a student. The disciplinary process is managed by the Office of the Vice President for Enrollment Management and Learner Services. The Office will decide if the filed complaint has enough merit to be developed into a complaint to be resolved through the full disciplinary process. An investigating officer will be assigned to the case in order to gather information from the student and witnesses involved. Instead of having an adversarial system between the student that submitted the complaint against the subject of the complaint, the University pursues disciplinary action against the accused student on behalf of the complaining student.

If formal disciplinary charges are to be levied against a student, the student will have to attend a formal hearing. Hearings will be held in front of the Student Conduct Committee. At hearings, students will have a chance to present their own witnesses and also review the information contained in the investigative report. Hearings will follow an agenda determined by the committee, but students are guaranteed a time period to present their defense. Following the presentation of all pertinent information, the Committee will retire to deliberate and make a decision. Decisions will be made using the standard of "a preponderance of the evidence."

At hearings, students are welcome to be accompanied by an advisor of their own choosing. A finding of responsibility for sexual misconduct can result in serious, far-reaching consequences, independent of any University sanctions. Due to the seriousness of sexual misconduct allegations, students should select an attorney to serve as their advisor. Attorneys will be able to provide courtroom experience and insight to students at a hearing. This can strongly influence the outcome of any hearing. In addition, students may be assisted by attorneys should they experience any additional adverse consequences that stem from the initial reporting at Thomas Edison State University.

Thomas Edison University Appeals

In the event of an unfavorable outcome, students may petition the University for an appeal of the decision. Appeals must be on the grounds of an unfair hearing, bias of a staff member who conducted a hearing, overly severe sanctions, a violation of the procedural integrity, and/or new and substantial information. Students have 15 business days following the results of the initial hearing to make an appeal.

If you or your student is currently facing Title IX charges or allegations of sexual misconduct at Thomas Edison State University, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.