How does the Title IX Final Rule evaluate a school's disciplinary decision?

The Title IX Final Rule will not second-guess a school's disciplinary decisions. It will require a school to provide supportive measures and remedies to a complainant if a respondent is found responsible. The unfortunate reality is that when a respondent is found responsible for sexual harassment or sexual misconduct, all bets are off. Remedies could include up to and including expulsion from the school. Many schools, as a baseline, start at a suspension. With aggravating circumstances, there could be an expulsion. It would be a rare instance that there would be sufficient mitigating circumstances for a suspension to be reduced to probation. The stakes are incredibly high, both for a respondent and a complainant. Ultimately, the Title IX Final Rule gives schools wide discretion as to what would be appropriate if a respondent is found responsible, both in terms of providing the supportive measures to the complainant and also directly sanctioning the respondent.

If you're facing a Title IX concern or sexual misconduct case, having an experienced attorney advisor in your corner from as early as possible in the process will help you best navigate the process and will help you work towards trying to ensure a fair process and a favorable outcome.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.