What sanctions can be imposed if a student is found responsible for misconduct?

If a student is found responsible for misconduct, the sanctions can vary. It's going to depend on the school involved. It's going to depend on the nature of the conduct that a student is found responsible for. Is it Title IX sexual misconduct? If so, is it of a more grievous nature, say nonconsensual sex or is it something of a lesser form? Is it academic misconduct? Is it the students first time that they committed academic misconduct?

Now is it the second time where there's mandatory minimum penalties in a sense where it would require an automatic suspension? Is it a general disciplinary issue such as hazing, which in many instances, if a student's found responsible could result in a separation from the school such as suspension or if not expulsion so it can vary. Certain offenses are more likely to result in certain outcomes.

For example, with the Title IX case, non-consensual sex 99 out of 100 times if a student is found responsible, they will be expelled. A penetration of any kind at a minimum would result in a suspension. Plagiarism for example, or any academic misconduct cheating on an exam. If it happens a second time, the consequences are going to be much more severe. An experienced attorney can help gauge what the potential consequences can be and he can help a student make the best decisions regarding how a case should be addressed.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.