Defense for Title IX Mandatory Reporters

Mandatory reporting is a policy requirement in educational settings to protect victims of certain, often sex-related, crimes. The category of protected victims is broad and includes students, visitors, faculty, or other school employees. According to policy mandates, mandatory reporters must report the bad behavior even when the victims don't want the misconduct to be reported.

The federal law that gives rise to mandatory reporting serves various purposes but does not always give schools a clear definition of what, or who, a mandatory reporter is. As a result, many schools cast a wide net. For example, under UCLA’s policies, mandatory reporters are described as athletic coaches and:

“an employee or administrator whose duties bring the administrator or employee into contact with children on a regular basis, or who supervises those whose duties bring the administrator or employee into contact with children on a regular basis, as to child abuse or neglect occurring on that institution's premises or at an official activity of, or program conducted by, the institution.”

Understanding who is a mandatory reporter can at times feel ambiguous, and the law under which reporting is triggered can dictate whether or not you violated your mandatory reporting duties.

Who is a Mandatory Reporter?

A mandatory reporter is someone obligated by their university's policies to report abuses and crimes that fall within federal parameters. Three federal laws mandate reporting of violative behavior that occurs in academia in certain situations. These three federal laws are:

  • The Clery Act
  • Title VII
  • Title IX

While the federal laws do not in themselves create mandatory reporters, universities have defined the role as a way to protect themselves from liability. Each of the three federal laws imposes a requirement on the university to be aware of, and to stop, wrongdoing. Accordingly, the universities pass this obligation on to their employees via mandatory reporting requirements.

Most universities place a general reporting requirement on employees, and generally, anyone aware of misconduct must report it. Under the Clery Act, reporting is done for data collection purposes and can be made anonymously. There are consequences when mandatory reporters fail to report, but an experienced mandatory reporter defense attorney will help you understand the nuance in your obligations. For instance, an obligation to report under Title VII is not as broad as under Title IX.

Mandatory Reporting Under the Clery Act

The Clery Act is a law designed to foster transparency in campus crime statistics and policies. To comply with the Clery Act, colleges and universities must provide an annual report that sets forth crime data for the prior three years.

The crimes that require reporting under the Clery Act include, but are not limited to:

  • Criminal homicide
  • Sexual misconduct
  • Robbery
  • Aggravated assault
  • Burglary
  • Vehicle theft
  • Arson
  • Theft, assault, intimidation, and vandalism when motivated by discrimination

The Clery Act requires “campus security authorities” to report misconduct. Campus security authorities are those with a significant responsibility in student life. This can include faculty, athletic coaches, department administrators, and even other students if resident assistants live in the dorms.

Reporting under the Clery Act can be anonymous. However, it's important to remember that if the mandatory reporting is triggered under this act, it's likely that the incident will need to be reported under Title VII or Title IX, which is not anonymous and further triggers an investigation.

Mandatory Reporting Under Title VII

Title VII is part of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and specifically, “Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin.” Violations of Title VII are considered sexual harassment and include:

  • “Unwelcome sexual advances”
  • “Requests for sexual favors”
  • “Other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature”

While we often think of mandatory reporting in terms of student victims of misconduct, Title VII applies to victims employed by the university who suffer from the harassment of coworkers or employers.

Those required to report acts of sexual harassment in a college or university workplace will vary from place to place. Often, those in a supervisory role will be required to report. When in doubt, it's wise to report violations of Title VII to the appropriate department. At UCLA, for example, the new Civil Rights Office will handle reports of sexual misconduct that violate Title VII.

Mandatory Reporting Under Title IX

Title IX is part of the Education Amendments of 1972, and the law is enforced by the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights. Like Title VII, Title IX is also concerned with sexual misconduct. Misconduct that triggers mandatory reporting under Title IX include acts involving discrimination on the basis of sex. The law specifically provides that:

“No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”

The statute's language has been interpreted to include sexual harassment, rape, and discriminatory behavior and abuses.

What differentiates Title IX from Title VII is that the victims of Title IX can also include individuals who are not victimized by someone they work with or for. For example, an instructor who discriminates or harasses a student is acting in violation of Title IX. This example wouldn't necessarily violate Title VII unless the student was employed as the instructor's assistant.

Reporting mandates under Title IX are implied from the law. The statute requires that schools promptly and effectively remedy the misconduct. Since a school cannot comply unless they know about the bad behavior, they need to mandate the reporting of Title IX violations.

Penalties for Violating Title IX Mandatory Reporting

If a school fails to comply with Title IX, the penalties can be catastrophic. Essentially, the school is at risk of losing the federal funding it receives. The funds at risk of being withdrawn include federal student loan funding and grants for various projects, to name just a few. In 2018, for example, a school district in Chicago lost out on $4 million in federal grant money after the U.S. Department of Education determined that the district “hasn't demonstrated that it is meeting civil rights obligations to address specific sexual violence complaints or larger patterns of harm.”

While the Department of Education doesn't hold mandatory reporters individually responsible for failing to meet Title IX mandates, you can be sure that the schools losing the funding will.

Failure to report a federal violation can have dire consequences. For those in positions of power, like coaches, directors, or even university presidents, failure to report and stop patterns of misbehavior lead to termination and sometimes criminal charges. When the reputations of high-profile universities are at issue, media coverage can turn those who failed to report into pariahs who will have difficulty finding gainful employment for the rest of their lives.

Failure of Mandatory Reporting Defenses

At the end of the day, the college or university that alleges you violated your mandatory reporting duties will do just about anything to absolve themselves of liability. Pointing the finger is common, and you deserve to assert every defense available to you.

Defenses to claims that you failed to report include, but are not limited to:

  • You provide confidential support services and are excluded from the mandate.
  • You were not an employee of the school.
  • Your school did not provide clear guidance on who is considered a mandatory reporter.
  • Your school lacked an effective Title IX coordinator or reporting system.

Private Schools vs. Public Schools

It's important to understand that federal laws only apply to schools that receive federal funding. Often, private schools receive at least some federal funding, and even when they don't, they've instituted policies that mirror public school Title IX misconduct codes as a way to shield themselves from civil liability. If you've been accused of failing to report misconduct, you need to contact a mandatory reporter defense attorney who can help you review and understand your school's policies.

Hiring a Mandatory Reporter Defense Attorney

When a college or university finds itself in a sexual harassment scandal, its immediate concern will be mounting a damage control campaign. Part of that campaign will undoubtedly be looking at the individuals who they can point to as having dropped the ball and failed in making the university at large aware of the misconduct.

If you find yourself in the position of having to defend yourself against accusations that you failed your mandatory reporter duties, then you need to contact a mandatory reporter defense attorney right away. An experienced defense attorney will help you see nuance in the situation and can lead you through the process of understanding what your obligations were and how you can defend your actions. It's easy to feel overwhelmed when your college or university throws their full weight into allegations against you, but you deserve to fight back and mount your own defense.

Attorney Joseph D. Lento has unparalleled experience defending mandatory reporters across the United States. Attorney Lento and his dedicated team at the Lento Law Firm work tirelessly to ensure your rights are protected. It is hard to overstate how much is at stake when you're accused of violating mandatory reporting mandates. Still, your best chance at overcoming the odds is through effective legal advocacy. To learn how Attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm can help you today, call 888-535-3686.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.