Delaware Valley University Title IX Violations

Delaware Valley University will handle cases of sexual misconduct within its student body with utmost seriousness. The University holds a Sexual Misconduct Policy which is utilized to both outline what behaviors constitute sexual misconduct, and what actions are taken by the University to enforce the policy. These processes are similar to those used for standard misconduct, however the University will often take special measures due to the nature of these types of allegations.

Delaware Valley University Sexual Misconduct Cases

The resolution process for sexual misconduct cases begins when a formal report is sent to a University official. The University will first conduct an initial evaluation of the matters to determine if it warrants pursuit under the Title IX sexual misconduct policy. The University will also consider if there are to be any immediate measures to be taken against the individual facing allegations, such as temporary suspension, class rescheduling, or possible no-contact orders. The University will use an investigation and resolution process to resolve and decide these cases. Throughout the process, the student who files the report will be known as the "complainant," while the student facing the allegations will be known as the "respondent." Title IX investigations will consist of separate meetings with complainant and respondent, along with any other witnesses that may have been suggested. After the investigation has concluded, a special board for handling sexual misconduct cases will be assembled for a hearing.


Hearings are held by the Student Conduct Board, and led by a chair. Hearings do not follow any specific schedule and will instead proceed according to the will of the board. However, despite any lack of set agenda, both complainant and respondent will in theory be guaranteed certain rights throughout the hearing process. Both parties may present information against one another and question one another, however, all questioning must be done indirectly through means of presenting the question in writing to the hearing board. Once enough information has been heard by the board, the board will close the hearing for deliberations. Decisions for cases will be made using the standard of a "preponderance of the evidence."

At hearings, students are entitled to the presence of an advisor of their own choosing. Sexual misconduct allegations are extremely serious and can have long lasting consequences on individuals facing them. Students may feel the consequences of these hearings throughout their entire academic and professional career. For these reasons, students should select an attorney to serve as their advisor in these matters. Attorneys can offer legal expertise, such as methods of questioning witnesses and constructing arguments, that can translate into success in a hearing. An attorney can also make certain an accused student's procedural rights and interests are protected through the Title IX investigation and disciplinary process. In addition, should any adverse consequences follow the initial reporting of these claims at Delaware Valley University, students may look to their attorney as a guide.

Appeals at Delaware Valley University

In the event of an unfavorable outcome, students may make an appeal. Appeals should be submitted within five (5) business days from the date of the outcome letter. The grounds for appeal are a a procedural error, new information, or a claim of excessive sanctions.

If you or your student is currently facing Title IX charges or sexual misconduct allegations at Delaware Valley University, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.