Student Defense – Stanford University Law School

Attending Stanford Law School can be exciting and stressful in equal measures. That feeling can take a sharp turn towards “stress” if a student finds themselves facing allegations of academic misconduct.

Stanford University Law School's Honor Code

The Honor Code used by Stanford Law School was written in 1921. It notes that students:

  • Should not help one another in exams, in class, or one homework assignments that will receive a grade from an instructor.
  • Will uphold a spirit of academic honesty on and off campus.
  • Will be treated with good faith by university faculty, and that faculty will take precautions to limit incidents that might encourage academic dishonesty.
  • Will not face academic expectations established by any parties besides their instructors.
  • Can work with instructors to cultivate environments meant to encourage learning and honesty.

In this vein, the Honor Code notes what behaviors the university and school note to directly violate its expectations. These include:

  • Plagiarism
  • Self-plagiarism
  • Collaboration with other students when it isn't permitted
  • Copying answers for an exam from another student or an instructor's private materials
  • Allowing another student to copy exam answers from one's assignments
  • Revising assignments without an instructor's knowledge and submitting those assignments for a grade.
  • Compensating another student to complete assignments, exams, and out-of-class work on one's behalf.
  • Engaging in behaviors that one might reasonably believe violates a sense of academic honesty.

The last of these points, detailing behaviors “reasonably believed” to violate the Honor Code, is deliberately vague in an attempt to cover any bases that the more specific notes of the code did not. The university does not make a point, in this vein, to describe how it understands “reasonably” to be defined, making it a little more difficult for students to act with the university's intentions in mind.

Stanford University Law School's Academic Misconduct Hearing Process

Students facing academic misconduct hearings may not know what to expect. Under normal circumstances, Stanford Law School makes a point of contacting accused students and providing them with the means they need to understand what the process entails.

With that in mind, hearing processes at Stanford Law School involve the following steps:

  1. An instructor or another supervisor body must submit a formal concern to the Office of Community Standards. This report should detail the ways in which the party believes that a student has breached Stanford Law School's Honor Code.
  2. The Office of Community Standards will review the report and determine whether or not it is necessary to pursue the concern.
  3. Should the office move forward, then the student in question will be notified that their behavior is under investigation. At this time, students may begin gathering evidence of their own – classwork, reports from the class, and eyewitness accounts – to present their half of the debate.
  4. Students will be assigned a Judicial Advisor who can walk them through the Stanford Law School hearing process. Students may also reach out to legal advisors to learn more about how they can build their cases.
  5. A judicial officer will proceed with an investigation into the student's behavior. This party will bring that evidence forward and assess it alongside elected panelists to determine whether or not the accused student violated the university's honor code.
  6. If the accused student seems to have engaged in the behaviors alleged against them in the initial report, then the panel and representatives from the Office of Community Standards may issues sanctions against that student.

Appealing a Panel Decision

Students facing sanctions do have the right to appeal those sanctions. To file an appeal, a student must prove that:

  • The process through which their behavior was assessed involved procedural error.
  • New evidence appeared regarding their alleged behavior.
  • A member of the judicial panel displayed bias against them during the hearing process.
  • The student's rights were violated during the hearing process.

Students must present evidence of the above within thirty days of the original hearing. The Office of Community Standards will reply within twenty days of receiving a student's documentation. Should the student's appeal be considered, then the office will bring together a Final Appeals Panel to reassess the accusations leveled against the student in question. This panel may choose to:

  • Reject the appeal.
  • Call in the original panel to reassess the case.
  • Build a new panel to reassess the case.
  • Limit or otherwise adjust the sanctions leveled against the student.
  • Dismiss the charges a student faces altogether.

What Consequences Can Students Accused of Academic Misconduct Face?

Stanford Law School assigns sanctions to students in violation of its honor code based both on the severity of the student's alleged behavior and on the nature of that behavior. With that in mind, sanctions fall into the following categories:

  • Educational
  • Community-oriented
  • Restorative
  • Restrictive
  • Restitution-oriented

A Judicial Officer is required to assign a student with sanctions involving at least one, if not more, of the aforementioned categories. In general, these sanctions can include:

  • A formal warning noted on the student's permanent record but dismissed after that student graduates.
  • Academic or behavioral probation.
  • Deprivation of Rights and Privileges, during which time the student's permitted activities on campus are limited.
  • Monetary restitution for damages inflicted against the university.
  • Community service.
  • Conditional suspension.
  • Expulsion.
  • Denied or delayed delivery of a degree.

Should Students Work With Legal Advisors?

Stanford Law School assigns all students accused of academic misconduct a Judicial Advisor. These parties are meant to guide a student through the hearing process and ensure that they have the tools they need to understand their rights. The presence of a judicial advisor, however, does not mean that students and families facing these types of accusations cannot seek outside guidance, and too much is at stake to trust your future to someone who is not solely dedicated your cause.

Attorney-advisor Joseph D. Lento and Lento Law Firm have helped hundreds of law students across the nation fight to protect their academic and professional careers. Law school disciplinary proceedings are characterized by an intense and rigorous process unlike almost all other academic institutions, and you need professional help to navigate such a process as best as possible. Attorney-advisor works with Standford Law students and their Judicial Advisors throughout an academic misconduct investigation and hearing to ensure a fair process and the best possible outcome. To schedule a case consultation, students and their families can reach out to the firm at 888-535-3686 or by using the firm's online form.

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu