Misericordia University

Misericordia University's Office of Community Standards upholds and enforces the University's Code of Conduct. The University's Student Handbook holds the Code and also the Disciplinary Process used when a student is suspected of a violation of the Code.

Misericordia University Discipline Process

A complaint against a student for a Code violation can be filed by any member of the University Community. Violations are typically broken down into two categories: major and minor violations. "Major" are considered the most serious because they are actions that jeopardize the well-being of the University community. Once a student is charged with violating the Code, the hearing will take place in one of two forms: Informal or Formal.

Informal Hearing

A student charged with minor violations will receive the notice of charges, and within 5 business days, go to a meeting with an Administrative Hearing Officer. The Administrative Hearing Officer can be a Resident Director, Director of Residence Life, Assistant Director of Residence Life, or the Coordinator of Student Affairs. The Informal Hearing is an attempt to resolve any potential violations without escalation. The student can take responsibility for their alleged violations at the time of the meeting and will receive the appropriate sanction, or the Administrative Hearing Officer will make a finding using the standard of a preponderance of evidence.

Formal Hearing

Formal Hearings will take place in front of the University Student Conduct Board. Formal Hearings are typically reserved for adjudicating major violations. The University Student Conduct Board itself will consist of 3 members: one faculty member, one member of the Student Affairs staff, and one member of the student body.

At Formal Hearings, students will speak in front of the board. Students will have the chance to present evidence and witnesses in their own defense. If the student, for whatever reason, is considered a perceived threat to others, they may not be allowed on campus or in their classes until the hearing is resolved. The board will hear out the facts of the case and decide by vote using the standard of a "preponderance of evidence" to hold the student responsible for a violation. If the student is found "responsible," the board will make a recommendation of what sanctions to assign to the Dean of Students, who will finalize the decisions.

The University prefers to keep any hearings between University personnel, witnesses, and the students involved in the case. Students are entitled to an adviser, provided that the adviser is a member of the University community. A community adviser is not likely to have the skills and experience necessary to help put up a good defense, nor will they have the level of investment in the student's case that an attorney will. Students can receive help from an attorney from behind the scenes. A skilled and experienced attorney will be able to provide students with valuable insight into courtroom tactics and proper methods of interviewing witnesses and presenting evidence. This insight can strongly influence the outcome of a hearing.

Misericordia University Appeals

Should the student receive an unfavorable outcome, there is a chance for appeal. Appeals must be made within 5 business days. The grounds for appeal are procedural error or new evidence. Appeals are submitted online through the University's system. A letter of Appeal must reference the student's violation, the grounds of appeal, and a proposed outcome from the student.

If you or a loved one is currently facing disciplinary action from Misericordia University, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.