Boston University School of Medicine

In 1873, what is now the Boston University School of Medicine (BUSM) was established when Boston University and the New England Female Medical College merged. Each year, roughly 180 new medical students are admitted to BUSM and must be prepared to demonstrate high standards in academics and “behavioral attributes of responsibility, empathy, and service excellence.” The institutional leadership created an Appropriate Treatment in Medicine (ATM) Policy, which clearly outlines their expectations.

Medical schools have high hopes for their students in academic performance, professionalism, and integrity. Students that are in remediation struggling to meet the minimum standards or those facing potential disciplinary actions for misconduct have too much at stake. Under these circumstances, students should speak to their families and promptly retain an attorney-adviser that will lend support and guidance. This assistance may result in minimizing harsh sanctions and other long-term consequences.

Example of Demonstrating a Lack of Professionalism

  • Inadequate efforts to maintain patient confidentiality
  • Failing to make improvements after evaluations and feedback
  • Using language or expressions that appear demeaning or discourteous

The Medical Student Disciplinary Code of Academic and Professional Conduct is founded in the belief that all students must “uphold the standards of the medical profession.” Conduct that does not conform includes acts that suggest a lack of integrity, character, or professionalism.


The Associate Dean of Student Affairs (ADSA) is responsible for administering the Code of Conduct. The ADSA may attempt to informally address minor concerns or present the concerns to the Medical Student Disciplinary Committee (MSDC) when the conduct is egregious or persistent. The MSDC is tasked with objectively evaluating student conduct and may conduct a hearing where the student will answer the allegations. Students that face sanctions such as suspension or expulsion have 14 days to notify the Dean of the School of Medicine that they wish to appeal.


The Student Evaluation and Promotion Committee (SEPC) is responsible for identifying deficient academic performance and responding appropriately. One remedial strategy for academic difficulties is Decelerated Curriculum, which allows the student up to an extra 12 months to complete the coursework and improve their performance. Students with persistent performance deficiencies may be subject to dismissal from the institution.

Lawyer Provides Effective Advisory Representation for Medical Students

Medical school students represent the future of the medical profession; therefore, the standards of professionalism and integrity must be instilled early on in the educational and training process. The institution's faculty will react promptly when students are delivering poor or mediocre academic performance with remediation plans to determine if the student is truly appropriate for the profession. Students that are the subject of disciplinary proceedings for conduct that lacks professionalism are in jeopardy of facing harsh sanctions including suspension or expulsion.

Students with records and transcripts that show a history of subpar academic progress or lapses in professionalism are likely to encounter barriers to entry in residency programs, employment opportunities, and more. Medical students that are facing these concerns need to take decisive action to avoid these adverse consequences. Retaining an experienced attorney-adviser to assist in navigating the school's disciplinary process can produce positive results. Contact the office of attorney Joseph D. Lento at (888) 535-3686 for assistance.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.