How does a college or university determine remedies under the Title IX Final Rule?

Because your university will determine remedies under the Title IX Final Rule by making an evaluation as to what will best ensure a complainant equal educational access, this will consider various factors, the specific aspects of the case, the allegations involving the sexual harassment or sexual misconduct, the specific circumstances of the complainant and the respondent. The factors would be expansive in nature. The remedies can include the same individualized services that were provided to the complainant as supportive measures leading up to that point like prior to say, the finding of responsibility.

The difference between remedies and supportive measures is that remedies do not need to be non-punitive, they do not need to be non-disciplinary and they do not need to be not burdensome to the respondents. A remedy, for example, could be a respondent suspension or expulsion. It could be the respondent being removed from campus housing or not being allowed to participate on a sports team or a change in the respondent's class schedule.

The stakes are high, both for a complainant and the respondent in Title IX sexual misconduct case. Having an experienced attorney advisor in your corner from as early as possible in the process can help you best navigate the process and can help you work towards trying to ensure a fair process and a favorable outcome.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.