Holy Family University Title IX Violations

Holy Family University takes particular care when adjudicating matters of sexual misconduct that may occur within its student body. These instances are handled through a dedicated disciplinary process, outlined in the University's Student Handbook. The University's Title IX coordinator is responsible for overseeing and enacting this process.

Sexual Misconduct Process at Holy Family University

The process for investigating and adjudicating allegations of sexual misconduct begins when a student reports an incident to a University Official. The student who makes the complaint is known as the "complainant," while the student facing the allegations will be known as the "respondent." If the University has any reason to believe that a respondent may interfere with any investigation, or otherwise cause harm to the complainant or community as a whole, the respondent may face the imposition of certain interim measures. These measures can include changes to class schedules, alternative housing, and even an interim suspension. When a complaint is reviewed, it will be investigated by the Title IX Coordinator. Investigations will typically consist of separate interview sessions with both the complainant and respondent. Witnesses may also be interviewed or suggested by either party as well. After the investigation has concluded, the Title IX Coordinator will decide whether or not to move the case forward.


Hearings will be held and decided upon by a Judicial Hearing Board. The Hearing Board will consist of members dedicated to handling Sexual Misconduct cases. Hearings do not have a set agenda or schedule, and instead will be a more discussion and conversation-oriented inquiry. Both complainant and respondent will, in theory, be guaranteed certain rights. Prior to a hearing, both parties will have access to a list of witnesses and a summary of the evidence. They may also propose their questions at this time as well. The Judicial Board will decide what questions will be asked, and may not approve all questions suggested. At hearings, students may be able to present additional information as well. Once the discussions have concluded, the Judicial Hearing Board will close the hearing and deliberate to reach a finding. Decisions will be made using the standard of "a preponderance of evidence."

At hearings, students are entitled to the presence of an advisor. Hearings for sexual misconduct allegations are treated with utmost seriousness, and students will be facing severe sanctions more often than not. Sexual misconduct allegations can have long-term negative impacts on a student's goals, both academic and professional. For this reason, an attorney should serve as a student's advisor at hearings. Attorneys have specialized skills and knowledge they may impart to students at their hearings to bolster a strong defense. In addition, attorneys can help ensure that a student's rights are properly protected throughout the process. Finally, if any additional adverse consequences arise from the initial reporting at Holy Family University, an attorney can act as a guide to a student through these circumstances.

Holy Family University Appeals

In the event of an unfavorable outcome, students may make an appeal. Appeals must be submitted within five (5) business days of the outcome. The letter of appeal must demonstrate a material failure to follow procedures.

If you or your student is currently facing allegations of sexual misconduct or Title IX charges, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.