Student Misconduct – Law School – The University of Texas at Austin

The University of Texas at Austin's Law School welcomes students of all interests and ambitions. In cultivating an environment that helps these students grow, however, the university has to uphold a strict behavioral code. Students who find themselves in violation of the university's expectations can face serious consequences both in the moment and throughout their future careers.

Luckily, no student has to face accusations of academic misconduct at the University of Texas at Austin's Law School alone. Instead, Lento Law Firm can help. Students facing academic misconduct allegations can reach out to local representatives for guidance while addressing their accusations.

Academic Misconduct at the University of Texas at Austin's Law School

The University of Texas at Austin's Law School wants its students to succeed in their academic pursuits. To encourage that kind of positive growth, the university introduces its students to its code of conduct as soon as they're accepted into their program of choice. This code of conduct outlines the behaviors that the university categorizes as academic misconduct. These include:

  • Cheating
  • Plagiarism
  • Self-plagiarism
  • Falsifying academic records
  • Misrepresenting academic information
  • Securing unfair academic advantages
  • Collusion with other students

Faculty members who believe that a student has engaged in academic misconduct are obligated by the university to act. These parties can either meet with the student in question or file a referral of suspected violation with the Office of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity.

Faculty members who meet with their students can encourage that student to admit to the accusations leveled against them. Students who choose to do so can sign a Faculty Disposition. Faculty members can then deliver this document to the Office of the Dean of Students, where it will be reviewed. The student may face sanctions if the Office believes the allegations merit such a response.

The Hearing Process

Students who dispute a faculty member's allegations will meet with a representative from the Office of the Dean of Students. This representative will consider both the student's perspective on their behavior and the initial report submitted by a professor. From there, the Office will determine whether or not the student should go through the university hearing process. The Office will gather evidence regarding the faculty's allegations. If it looks like the evidence clearly implicates the student, then the Office can propose appropriate student sanctions. Students will be informed of this decision via an Administrative Disposition form.

At this point, students have two options. An accused student can accept the Office's decision and the applicable sanctions. Alternatively, the student can dispute the Office's findings and/or the sanctions issued against them.

Students who wish to argue against their sanctions may file an application to do so with their appellate officer. Comparatively, students who wish to dispute the findings presented by the Office of the Dean of Students may request a hearing with the Student Conduct Board or a Hearing Officer. The student may only call on a Hearing Officer if the Office of the Dean of Students recommends that they be suspended or expelled.

Hearing processes through the University of Texas at Austin's Law School involve the following steps:

  1. Initial communication between the student, the Office of the Dean of Student, a hearing officer, and the Student Conduct Board Panel.
  2. An interview with the student on the part of either a hearing officer of the Student Conduct Board Panel.
  3. Delivery of a notice of a hearing to all applicable parties.
  4. Elaboration on the student's grievances and the complaints issued by university faculty members.
  5. Presentation of applicable evidence on the part of all involved parties.
  6. Presentation of the board's decision.
  7. An application of sanctions, if appropriate.

Penalties for Misconduct on Campus

The University of Texas at Austin's Law School breaks down its sanctions into three categories. Students may face grade-related, status-based, and academic sanctions if accused of academic misconduct. All of these sanctions can have lasting impacts on a student's academic and professional career.

The university's status-based sanctions include:

  • Written warnings
  • Disciplinary probation
  • Academic integrity probation
  • Withholding of grades, official transcriptions, or a student's degree
  • Bar against enrollment and/or withdrawal
  • Restitution
  • Suspension of student privileges and/or rights
  • Denial of degree
  • Deferred suspension
  • Expulsion
  • Revocation of degree

Academic and grade-based sanctions through the university can include but are not limited to:

  • Lowering an assignment grade
  • Failing an assignment
  • Failing a course
  • Loss of course credit
  • Notice of academic misconduct on a student's transcript

The university and its hearing board apply sanctions based on the severity of the allegations brought against a student. The Office of the Dean of Students will retain records of a student's academic misconduct hearing for seven years.

Appealing Academic Misconduct Sanctions

Students do, however, have the opportunity to appeal the sanctions leveled against them. The Dean of Students will consider a student's appeal if:

  • The student or another party can bring forward new evidence regarding their accusations.
  • The student can prove that the hearing process was biased against them.
  • The student believes that their sanctions are more severe than their allegations merit.

Students who wish to appeal their sanctions must submit their request in writing to an appellate officer within ten days of the end of their hearing. The appellate officer has direct say over whether or not the appeal moves forward.

Talk Through a Misconduct Hearing With an Experienced Attorney-Advisor

The University of Texas at Austin's Law School holds its students to a high standard. Accusations of academic misconduct can put a student's standing at risk. If these accusations aren't challenged, then a student's future career may even be at stake.

No family has to take on these kinds of accusations on their own, though. Instead, students and their families can reach out to Lento Law Firm. Attorney Joseph D. Lento and his team can walk students through their accusations and aid them during an investigation, a misconduct hearing, and an appeal if necessary.

Interested in scheduling a case consultation? Reach out to Lento Law Firm at 888-535-3686 or via the firm's online form.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.