University of Chicago Academic Integrity Advisor

Academic integrity is the heart of the University of Chicago's intellectual community. All members of the university community are expected to live up to standards that preserve academic integrity and to support each others' efforts in this regard. 

When students fail to uphold school regulations regarding academic integrity, whether this is an intentional or unintentional act, schools won't hesitate to bring down the hammer. Thus, guilty determinations of academic misconduct have jeopardized students' college careers and has haunted them in their professional lives as well.

If you are a UChicago student whose been accused of academic misconduct, you absolutely need the help of a student defense attorney. In this article, we'll address how your school defines and mitigates academic misconduct and why you need a legal professional on your side. 

How Does UChicago Define Academic Misconduct?

Any behavior that doesn't align with UChicaog's academic integrity guidelines is considered academic misconduct. This is a pretty broad definition, so here are a few examples of the most commonly committed types of academic misconduct according to the UChicago's Honor Code.

  • Cheating: using or attempting to use unauthorized assistance, material, or study aids in examinations or other academic work or preventing, or attempting to prevent another from using authorized assistance, material, or study aids. Example: using a cheat sheet in a quiz or exam, using a cell phone or other technology to obtain or share information during an exam, altering a graded exam and resubmitting it for a better grade.
  • Plagiarism: using the ideas, data, or language of another without specific or proper acknowledgment. Example: copying another person's paper, article, or text from a website and submitting it for an assignment, quoting someone else's ideas without attribution, failing to use quotation marks where appropriate.
  • Fabrication: submitting contrived or altered information in any academic exercise. Example: making up data for an experiment, fudging data, citing nonexistent articles, contriving sources. 
  • Multiple submissions: submitting, without prior permission, any work submitted to fulfill another academic requirement. 
  • Facilitating academic dishonesty:  knowingly helping or attempting to help another violate any provision of the Code. Example: working together on a take-home exam. 
  • Unfair advantage:  attempting to gain unauthorized advantage over fellow students in an academic exercise. Example: gaining or providing unauthorized access to examination materials, obstructing or interfering with another student's efforts in an academic exercise, lying about a need for an extension for an exam or paper, continuing to write even when time is up during an exam, destroying or keeping library materials for one's own use. 
  • Misrepresentation of academic records:  misrepresenting or tampering with or attempting to tamper with any portion of a student's transcript or academic record, either before or after coming to the University of Chicago. Example: forging a change of grade slip, tampering with computer records, falsifying academic information on one's resume.

Misconduct can occur in any academic situation including, but not limited to, a course research project, independent study, presentation, qualifying examination, preliminary examination, or dissertation. 

UChicago's Procedures for Handling Academic Integrity Violations

Faculty members are given wide discretion to judge the academic work of their students. If a faculty member concludes that a student has violated academic integrity regulations, they have two options: (1) assign a grade that reflects their view that the work was done inappropriately, or (2)refer the matter to UChicago's Office of Student Conduct for discipline - depending on whether or not the student has admitted the violation. 

The university disciplinary process at UChicago may involve the following stages:

  • Bringing a complaint to the office of student conduct
  • Resolving a complaint by mediation
  • Investigating a complaint
  • Filing charges by the university against a student
  • Resolving charges by voluntary agreement to sanctions
  • Resolving charges by a disciplinary hearing
  • Appealing the decision of a hearing panel
  • Imposing sanctions on a student
  • Fulfilling sanctions imposed by the university

Sanctions

Students who are found “responsible” for academic misconduct via disciplinary hearing can be subjected to a wide range of sanctions. These include a warning, reprimand, a fine, restitution, disciplinary probation, the withdrawal of privileges, suspension, indefinite suspension, and in extreme cases, expulsion. In addition to these sanctions, students may be required to perform a designated number of hours of University or other community service. 

It's important to note that the effects of repercussions for an academic integrity violation are far-reaching and often extend outside of a student's education into their professional life. With evidence of this type of misconduct on your academic record, other institutions and jobs may question your integrity or morale. Government jobs, professions in law, and careers in academia are industries that have been known to disqualify applicants for having academic misconduct on their records. 

Appeals

Only respondents may appeal the hearing panel's findings of responsibility and/or recommendation of sanction(s). An appellant must submit any appeal to the Disciplinary Appellate Officer (DAO) in writing within 10 days after the Hearing Panel has rendered its opinion. The appeal must state in detail the specific grounds upon which it is based.

Appellate review is limited to allegations of material and prejudicial procedural error in the conduct of hearings, error in the interpretation or application of university regulations, the consideration of new evidence, or the accusation of too severe a sanction. After considering an appeal, the DAO will promptly issue his or her decision in writing and provide copies to the respondent.  

Academic Integrity Attorney

An academic misconduct violation can jeopardize the academic and professional goals you or your college student have set. If you value the investment you've made into your education and your professional future, contacting a skilled student defense attorney is a must. Attorney Joseph D. Lento has helped students who've acquired serious academic misconduct charges recover from these allegations, and he can do the same for you. Contact him today at 888-535-3686 for more information.

Contact Us Today!

Footer 2

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu