College Sexual Misconduct Advisor - Amherst College - Title IX Violations

Founded in 1821, Amherst College in central Massachusetts has an enrollment of roughly 1,849 students. The institution has a mission of educating those of “all backgrounds” and is “dedicated to intellectual freedom.” This mission is consistent with federal guidelines that pertain to Title IX, which is an amendment that requires educational institutions to properly address sexual discrimination.

Amherst College General Sexual Misconduct Statement

Amherst College has a Title IX Coordinator and five Deputy Title IX Coordinators. They believe that acts of sexual misconduct “corrupt the integrity” of the educational environment that they are devoted to maintaining. They emphasize how these responsibilities apply to the entire community “individually and collectively.”

How Amherst College Defines Sexual Misconduct

The administration explains that these acts extend beyond sexual harassment and violence. They seek to prevent “domestic and dating violence” and stalking activity. These are broadly considered to be acts of violence or intimidation that involve individuals that have some existing relationship.

Amherst College's Policy on Consent

The policies explain that consent to participate in sexual activity must be clearly demonstrated and willingly engaged in. Inferences may not be based on “silence, passivity, lack of resistance or active response alone.” Emphasis is placed on how consent must be demonstrated outwardly.

The Amherst Sexual Misconduct Adjudication Process (SMAP)

All parties associated with a complaint of misconduct are permitted to choose an Advisor. The school will make some reasonable effort to accommodate the schedule (availability) of this individual. The Advisor can accompany the party to meetings, inquiries, hearings, etc. These individuals are not permitted to create disruptions or “make verbal objections.”

During an investigation, the Title IX Coordinator or designated administrator may implement interim measures. The purpose is to limit the potential for subsequent acts of harassment in the interest of safety. Some of these measures include:

  • Establishing a “no-contact” or “restricted proximity” type of order
  • Making modifications to existing campus residential agreements or aspects of campus employment
  • Assisting with and accessing resources for emotional well-being
  • Imposing temporary suspensions

The college may consider various ways of investigating allegations. Interviews may be conducted with the parties and potential witnesses. When necessary, the Administrator may seek assistance from experts. Parties and witnesses may be permitted to remotely engage in a hearing via secure technology at the discretion of the Hearing Board.

Potential Voluntary Resolutions

If a Complainant and a Respondent both agree, the matter may be voluntarily resolved. Often these resolutions are the result of a form of mediation. Voluntary resolutions are considered inappropriate for complaints involving sexual violence. Statements made while trying to reach a voluntary resolution may not be used in subsequent hearings.

Hearing Board Members

Title IX matters are heard before a panel of three individuals chosen and trained according to the policy. Claims are evaluated using a preponderance of the evidence standard. The Dean of Students may either serve as a “Chair” or designate someone for this non-voting role.  Hearing board members may not include students, faculty members or others employed by Amherst College.

Presenting Witnesses at a Hearing

The parties must submit a summary of witnesses they wish to call 72 hours before a hearing. A written summary must be included for any witnesses that were not previously interviewed during the investigation. This statement must contain an overview of how the witness may present relevant information. Character witnesses are not permitted.

Submission of Impact Statement

An Impact Statement is a document that is submitted before a hearing that is used exclusively when determining the sanctions that will be imposed on a Respondent. Only information deemed as relevant will be considered.

Benefits of Retaining a Student Rights Attorney

Students who are alleged to have committed acts of sexual misconduct should promptly seek assistance from an advisor or an attorney well-versed in this area of practice. Timing is critical to ensure that your attorney will have sufficient time to prepare you to deliver concise statements and responses to questions.

Your attorney will closely scrutinize the evidence and may detect weaknesses or inconsistencies. He or she may also consider opportunities to engage in negotiations on your behalf.

Title IX Attorney Representing Students at Amherst College

College and university students facing allegations of misconduct related to Title IX should promptly seek support from a lawyer familiar with this unique area of practice. Contact the Lento Law Firm office today at (888) 535-3686 to discuss your Title IX case at Amherst College.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.