What is the time frame for a Title IX case under the Title IX Final Rule?

The Title IX Final Rule requires that schools have reasonably prompt timeframes for the conclusion of the Title IX grievance process, which would include any appeals and also say any informal resolution processes. The Title IX Final Rule also makes allowances for good cause, short term delays, and extensions of the timeframes as appropriate. Prior to the September 2017 questions and answers issued by the department of education, schools were mandated to complete Title IX cases within 60 days.

Even under those prior regulations, schools often did not do so. They often went beyond the 60 days. In September of 2017 prior to the enactment of the Title IX Final Rule schools were then allowed to shift to a reasonably prompt timeframe, and with the Title IX Final Rule itself, again it's specifically designated that schools are required to have a reasonably prompt timeframe.

People have to understand that a reasonably prompt timeframe will vary depending on the case involved. Title IX cases are most often measured in terms of weeks and months. They're never measured in terms of days. It would be an extremely rare instance if that were to be the case. It's both good and bad.

You obviously do not want an overly long or burdensome process, but you also do not want a rush to judgment because so much is at stake and because so much is involved. Having an experienced attorney advisor in your corner from as early as possible in the process would help you best navigate the process and would let you know what's both appropriate and not appropriate to the circumstances. Then they help you work towards trying to ensure a fair process and a favorable outcome.

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website.  In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County.  In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County,  In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties.  Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law.  The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship.  The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu