Susquehanna University

Susquehanna University governs its student body through the use of its Code of Student Conduct. The Code itself is located in the University's student handbook. Students who are suspected of committing acts that violate the code will face the University's Student Conduct System. If a student is held responsible for a violation, they will be subject to having sanctions imposed on them by the University.

The Student Conduct System process begins when a case referred to the Dean of Students & Campus Life. The case will be reviewed for merit, and if necessary, the case will be pursued.

Susquehanna University Student Conduct System

The Student Conduct System offers several methods used to resolve offenses. When participating in the Student Conduct System the person who initiated the charges will be known as the "complainant," while the student facing charges will be known as the "respondent."

Informal Resolution or Conduct Conference

Informal Resolution or a Conduct Conference will be used for offenses with penalties less severe than expulsion or suspension. The respondent will meet with a Conduct Officer to discuss allegations. The respondent can prepare a case and witnesses to present, and the Conduct Officer will attempt to reach an agreement with the respondent. If the respondent does not agree, a formal hearing can be requested.

University Conduct Board Hearings

There are two University Conduct Boards that can preside over a hearing. The first consists of 5 members (3 students and 2 faculty/staff), and the second is 3 members (all faculty/staff) and 1 non voting chair. The second board is used for the most serious violations.

Hearings will be led by a Conduct Officer. The Conduct Officer will also try to retain procedural integrity and direct the way the hearing proceeds, instead of having a set formula for how to proceed. Typically, a University official will present the facts of the case to start. The respondent and complainant are able present their own supporting evidence and witnesses. Both parties are also able to cross-examine one another's witnesses. The board members can question all witnesses and parties of the hearing for clarification on issues. After all the information has been heard, the board will go into deliberations. Decisions will be made using a majority vote and the standard of a "preponderance of evidence." If a student is found responsible for a violation, only then will the board consider the student's prior disciplinary record for the purpose of determining sanctions. If a student pleads responsible at the start of the hearing, then the hearing will be used solely to determine proper sanctions.

Students, although entitled to a support person, have restrictions on who their support person may be. Unfortunately both parents and attorneys may not accompany students into the hearing, however, an attorney working from behind the scenes can still be a great help. An attorney can offer counsel to a student, and help them to utilize courtroom-proven techniques to argue their case at a hearing. Armed with knowledge of methods for evidence presentation and cross-examination, students who have gotten help from an attorney will have a much better chance at securing a favorable outcome.

Susquehanna University Appeals

In the event of an unfavorable outcome, students have 5 business days to make an appeal of their hearing. The grounds for appeal are an error in due process, new evidence, or excessive penalties.

If you or your student is currently facing disciplinary action from Susquehanna University, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.