University of the District of Columbia Title IX Violations

Known as the only public university in the nation's capital, the University of the District of Columbia is where many in-state and out-of-state students have chosen to pursue their undergraduate and graduate degrees. Much like other federally funded schools, this institution places on emphasis on integrity, and has implemented federal regulations for all members of its campus community to abide by. Civil rights legislation, Title IX, specifically condemns and outright bars the exhibition of gender-based discriminatory behavior by UDC students.

Sexual misconduct is considered gender-based discrimination in accordance with Title IX, which means that schools are obligated to investigate and resolve all complaints reported of this nature. Students facing allegations of said behavior have been known to undergo dire repercussions upon being found responsible for sexual misconduct. In some cases, these consequences have kept students from fulfilling the ultimate goal of attending UDC in the first place: getting a degree. If you have been accused of sexual misconduct, it's important you understand the processes you are about to undergo, and the value of a dependable lawyer to occupy the role of an advisor throughout this process.

For the purposes of this article, we will provide a brief overview of UDC's Title IX process.

Title IX Process

UDC plans on wrapping up processes entirely within sixty calendar days, depending on the allegations presented. Throughout the process, an individual who identifies as a victim/survivor of the alleged sexual misconduct is referred to as a “complainant,” while an individual who is accused of said behavior will be referred to as a “respondent.”

Interim measures

When a complaint is received by the school's Title IX coordinator, one of his or her's first moves is protecting a complainant from potential retaliation - a serious violation of school policy. In an effort to do so, a Title IX coordinator and other school authorities may impose interim measures to keep all parties safe. The following measures may be temporarily imposed throughout the course of the school's Title IX process:

  • The issuing of a no contact order (no verbal, written, or third party communication between parties)
  • Parking and/or transportation accommodations
  • Housing rearrangements
  • Chances in work schedule or job assignments
  • Restrictive access to certain areas of the university etc.


This is the phase where respondents will be given a chance to tell their side of the story, and provide evidence to support their account of events. They, along with a complainant, and witnesses will be separately and thoroughly interviewed by fact-finding investigators. Once all the information is gathered, investigators will attempt to come to a resolution by comprising an investigative finding that indicates a determination of responsibility and a recommended sanction(s), if applicable. All decisions made in the investigation phase will be based on the preponderance of evidence standard - the evidence dictates that it was more likely than not or likely that a violation occurred.


The outcome of an investigation may be appealed by a respondent. An appeal is a written request for a school to reconsider a determination and/or sanction(s). But in order for an appeal to be granted, it must be based on reasonable grounds. The sole grounds for an appeal includes, but is not limited to:

  • A procedural error significantly affected a determination and/or sanction
  • New information that was not available at the time of an investigator surfaced that could have reasonably affected a determination and/or sanction
  • The sanction is not proportionate to the severity of a violation

Students have within 5 business days to submit a written appeal.

Title IX Advisor

Choosing an attorney as your advisor can level the playing field in a system that is designed to slight and disadvantage you. Skilled legal professional Joseph D. Lento has helped guide students who were once in through these processes successfully, and he can do the same for you. Contact him today for help.

Title IX violations and Title IX charges can change an accused student's life if not defended against properly and as early as possible during the disciplinary process, and Joseph D. Lento has nearly a decade of experience passionately fighting for the future of his clients at universities and colleges throughout the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead, prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph Lento is a licensed attorney in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, is admitted as an attorney pro hac vice in state and federal court if needed when representing clients nationwide, and serves as a Title IX advisor to students facing disciplinary cases in Washington, D.C. and throughout the nation. Make certain your or your student's interests are protected - Joseph D. Lento can help.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.