Dental Student Professionalism Concerns

The United States has some of the best dental schools in the world. While dental science forms the core of dental school curriculums, dental schools, including top ten schools at the University of Michigan, University of North Carolina, University of Washington, Harvard, and UCLA, maintain professionalism policies to which they expect their students to adhere. Violating dental school professionalism policy can lead to misconduct charges and discipline up to dismissal from the dental program. Dental schools take professionalism seriously. Dental students should thus take seriously any misconduct charges. Immediately retain national academic attorney Joseph D. Lento if you face dental school misconduct charges.

Dental School Professionalism Norms

The University of Washington School of Dentistry, among other top ten dental schools, has a typical professionalism policy stating:

The School has the responsibility to the public to assure that its graduates can become fully competent dentists, capable of delivering quality care in a timely manner and preserving the health and well-being of the patients they serve. Thus, it is important that persons admitted, retained, and graduated possess the intelligence; integrity; respect for the rights, privileges, and property of others; compassion; humanitarian concern; and physical and emotional capacity necessary to practice dentistry.

Notice that these typical professionalism norms expressed in the University of Washington School of Dentistry's policy include:

  • competence in professional practice;
  • timeliness in providing quality care;
  • preservation of patient health and well being;
  • intelligence, expressed as knowledge of current practice;
  • integrity, expressed as consistency of action to commitments;
  • respect for the rights and property of others;
  • compassion and concern; and
  • physical and emotional fitness.

The American Dental Association publishes its own code of conduct and principles of ethics to express “the obligations arising from the implied contract between the dental profession and society.” State dental associations and licensing boards, along with the dental schools themselves, use the ADA code as a pattern for their own professionalism requirements. The ADA code includes these commitments:

  • to preserve patient autonomy, involving the patient in the choice of the patient's care;
  • to do no harm, such as to abandon patients, act while impaired, or expose patients to blood-borne pathogens;
  • to do good, including to report abuse or neglect, treat co-workers respectfully, and not disrupt the dental practice;
  • to act justly with respect to access to dental services, dental fees, and marketing; and
  • to act truthfully, representing care accurately, billing without fraud, avoiding unnecessary services, and advertising without misleading.

Dental School Professional Misconduct

Common Forms. The above professionalism norms suggest the kind of misconduct in which dental students might engage, leading to discipline. That misconduct can surely include some of the forms of misconduct in which other college and university students might engage, like:

  • Title IX sexual misconduct involving sexual violence, sexual harassment, or quid pro quo sexual favors;
  • non-Title IX sexual misconduct involving sexual exploitation such as voyeurism, exposure, solicitation to prostitution, and invasion of privacy;
  • behavioral misconduct like alcohol abuse, drug abuse, non-sexual threats and violence, vandalism, trespass, and misuse of school computers.

Peculiar Forms. The above professionalism norms, also suggest kinds of misconduct in which dental students might engage, leading to discipline, that are unusual to dental or other healthcare practices. That peculiar misconduct in which dental students in clinical courses providing actual dental care, or graduates in residency programs, might unfortunately engage or face school accusations of engaging, can include:

  • exceeding consent with a service the patient had not authorized;
  • recommending or providing unnecessary dental services;
  • using a method or material other than that represented to the patient;
  • performing or attempting to perform while impaired;
  • abandoning a patient without completing stabilizing care;
  • exposing a patient to blood-borne pathogens;
  • refusing a patient critical emergency care when positioned to provide it;
  • failing to report abuse or neglect of a dental patient;
  • harassing co-workers, disrupting dental practice;
  • using the position or practice of dentistry to coerce patient favor; or
  • abusing the tools and methods of dentistry for exploitative gain.

Potential Sanctions. The potential sanctions for dental student professionalism misconduct depend on the nature and seriousness of the findings, and any mitigating circumstances. Typical potential sanctions authorized by school or university policy include oral or written warning, oral or written reprimand, reduction of course grade, loss of course credit, disciplinary probation, deferred or actual suspension, deferred or actual dismissal, and degree withholding or revocation. Obviously, the potential sanctions for professional misconduct warrant a dental student's most-serious treatment of misconduct charges.

Dental School Professionalism Procedures

When a patient, fellow student, professor, supervisor, director, or other person or school official observes and reports suspected dental student misconduct, dental schools follow discipline procedures to resolve the misconduct charges. Some dental schools, like the top ten University of North Carolina Adams School of Dentistry, refer to elaborate university misconduct procedures to address misconduct charges. Other dental schools, like the top-ranked University of Michigan School of Dentistry, delegate professionalism issues to an honor system advisory committee, suggesting less elaborate procedures, at least for misconduct peculiar to the teaching and educational practice of dentistry. Dental schools would follow the elaborate federally mandated procedures for Title IX sexual misconduct.

Dental students are not lawyers. As skilled and educated as dental students are, after four years of an undergraduate program and some months or years of professional school, dental students would still not generally possess the litigation skills and knowledge of academic administrative procedures necessary to effectively defend professionalism misconduct charges. The complexity of elaborate procedures, or the mysteriousness of unpublished practices, require skilled and experienced academic attorney representation.

Retain Premier Representation

Do not face dental professionalism misconduct charges on your own. Do not hire any lawyer, even one who litigates frequently in court. Academic administrative procedures differ from court procedures. Academic norms and student conduct codes differ from criminal codes. Instead, retain national academic attorney Joseph D. Lento who has helped countless dental, medical, and other professional, graduate, and undergraduate students. A dental professionalism misconduct proceeding can challenge and unnerve the accused dental student, with all that dental students have at stake in misconduct proceedings. Don't overlook your opportunity to retain national academic attorney Joseph D. Lento to represent you in your proceeding. Attorney Lento's premier representation can help you successfully defend and defeat dental professionalism misconduct charges. Retain attorney Lento and his expert team at the Lento Law Firm today by calling 888.535.3686 or going online.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.