Temple University Process Review Meeting

The administration at Temple University has developed guidelines that reflect their standards and expectations for student behavior and conduct. They have a Student Code containing the rules and disciplinary procedures. These provisions are focused on respecting the rights of others, maintaining a safe environment, and upholding the principles of academic integrity.

Student Conduct Administration

The University Code Administrator is appointed by the university president to administer the Student Code. The University Code Administrator then designates a Student Conduct Administrator that manages disciplinary actions. When a complaint is received, the Student Conduct Administrator hosts a Process Review Meeting. This is a “non-adversarial” gathering with one party such as the accuser, the accused or an alleged victim.

Process Review Meeting

The purpose of this meeting is to inform the participants of how the conduct process works. Written notification will state and summarize the allegations and contain information about the procedures for a disciplinary hearing. The accused student or student organization is notified of their right to have a Personal Advisor present at the Process Review Meeting.

Role of Personal Advisor

A Personal Advisor is defined as someone that assists a party in the Student Conduct Process. The individual is to have a “non-active” role in formal proceedings. This person will not address the Student Conduct Board directly in meetings or hearings. The Personal Advisor may be an attorney or another individual willing to accompany and assist a party.

Possible Outcomes of a Process Review Meeting

The Student Conduct Administration may find that “there is no basis for charges” and halt any further proceedings. They may propose that an alternative resolution be considered, such as a form of mediation. All of the parties must be in agreement to proceed with any type of alternative resolution. If an alternative resolution is successful, there are no disciplinary sanctions imposed.

Alternative resolutions are not appropriate for matters with allegations involving serious violations. Examples may include potential acts of sexual misconduct. When appropriate, the Student Conduct Administration will schedule a hearing where all parties will be present. Hearings are led by a Chairperson and evidence and testimony are presented before a Student Conduct Board.

The accused party may not be forced to testify. The Student Conduct Board is not to draw any conclusions based on a decision to remain silent. After the presentation of evidence, the Board will deliberate to reach a decision based on a majority vote. The standard used is “more likely than not.”

Importance of Retaining Representation from a Lawyer

Those found to have violated the Temple University Student Code of Conduct may face sanctions that include a loss of privileges, probation, suspension, expulsion, and others. Having experienced representation will ensure that you are well prepared for a hearing. Your attorney will identify any favorable evidence that should be presented and potentially achieve a favorable resolution.

Experienced Student Disciplinary Defense Attorney in Philadelphia

Have you been accused of violating your school's code of conduct? College and university administrators are now imposing potentially significant sanctions that can have long-term ramifications for your future. Contact the office of attorney Joseph D. Lento today at (215) 535-5353 for assistance.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.