Gannon University Title IX Violations

Gannon University upholds a Sexual Misconduct Policy for resolving any incidents of sexual misconduct that arise within the University's student body. The University enforces this policy through a separate disciplinary process from the one utilized for standard behavioral misconduct.

Gannon University Sexual Misconduct Policy

The Sexual Misconduct Process begins when a complaint is filed with a University official. When a student files a complaint, throughout the process they will be referred to as "complainant," while the student facing the allegations will be known as the "respondent." The first step is the determination of whether or not informal procedures will be used to resolve the case. Informal procedures may only be used when both complainant and respondent agree to resolve the manner in this manner. In addition, the University may also elect to change the resolution method to a formal procedure at any time. Informal procedures are not used when allegations involve sexual assault.

Formal Procedures

For formal procedures, the University will conduct an investigation into the incident. An Investigative Team will be assembled, and meetings will be held with both the complainant and the respondent. After the initial interviews, the team will assemble an investigative report. Once the report is assembled, the team will meet once more to review its contents with both parties, separately. At this meeting, either party can add new information, clarify statements, or suggest new witnesses to be considered in the report. Once the report is finalized, a hearing will be scheduled.

Hearings will be led and decided upon by the Sexual Misconduct Committee. Hearings begin with a brief introductory phase, led by the committee Chair. The Investigative Team opens the informational phases with a summary of the investigative report. After this, both parties will present their statements to the committee. The committee will question both students. Following this, the students will have an opportunity to indirectly question one another through the committee Chair. The committee will follow with a final round of questioning and close the hearing for deliberations. Decisions are made using the standard of "a preponderance of the evidence."

At hearings and throughout investigative meetings, students are entitled to the presence of an advisor. Sexual misconduct allegations can have far-reaching negative consequences on a student's academic and professional goals. Because of this, students should select an attorney to serve as their advisor. An attorney will be able to ensure that a student's rights are protected throughout the process, and can also provide insight into methods of argument and cross-examination that can prove invaluable in a University hearing setting.  In addition, if additional adverse consequences result from the reporting of the allegations at Gannon University, an attorney can serve as a student's guide.

Gannon University Appeals Process

In the event of an unfavorable outcome, students have a chance to make an appeal. Appeals must be submitted within five (5) business days of the hearing's outcome. The grounds for an appeal are procedural error or new evidence for consideration.

If you or your student is currently facing Title IX charges or allegations of sexual misconduct at Gannon University, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.