Albright College Title IX Violations

Albright College takes instances of sexual misconduct that arise within its student body very seriously. The College outlines the process used for administering discipline in these cases in the Compass, the College's student handbook. The College will utilize a process that mirrors the one used for instances of standard misconduct, however, special measures will apply for sexual misconduct cases. In addition, the sanctions and related consequences faced by students in sexual misconduct cases are often much more severe.

Albright College Sexual Misconduct Process

When a student makes a claim of a sexual misconduct violation, the College will begin the Student Conduct Process. During the process, the student who files the complaint will be known as "complainant," while the student who faces allegations will be known as the "respondent." The College's Office of Community Standards will first consider whether or not the respondent poses any potential threat to either the complainant or the College community, and may consider implementing certain measures to protect the investigation or the College community; such measures can include, for example, housing relocation, a change of class schedule, and/or an interim suspension.

Informational Meeting

An informational meeting is a brief, mandatory meeting with the respondent that is meant to inform them of the charges they face and the community standards process overall. Respondents will also be given access to the information that will be presented against them regarding the Title IX charges themselves.


Hearings will be held in front of a specific Conduct Board chosen to handle allegations of Title IX sexual misconduct. At hearings, the chairperson will begin by calling the hearing to order and reading the complaint. The respondent will then accept or deny responsibility as a form of entering a plea. First, the complainant will present their case, evidence and witnesses. The respondent will then have an opportunity to question witnesses, but not the complainant. Next the chair and the board will question the complainant and witnesses. Following this stage, the respondent may present their case in a similar fashion with questioning done as before. Next, both parties will summarize their cases, and the chair will close the hearing for deliberation. Decisions will be made using the standard of "a preponderance of evidence."

At hearings, students are entitled to an advisor of their own choosing. Sexual misconduct allegations are of a particularly serious nature, and as such can carry penalties and related consequences much more severe than what a student would face otherwise. For this reason, students should select an attorney to serve as their advisor throughout these matters. An attorney will be able to to provide students with specialized courtroom knowledge that can be critical to achieving a favorable outcome at a hearing, such as methods of questioning witnesses or formulating closing arguments. An attorney will also be able to ensure that a student's rights remain protected throughout the Title IX investigation and disciplinary process. Lastly, if any adverse related consequences result from the initial allegations being reported at Albright College, an attorney can guide a student through such circumstances.

Appeals at Albright College

If the hearing results in an unfavorable outcome, students may make an appeal. Appeals must be submitted within five (5) business days. The grounds for appeal are a procedural violation or new evidence.

If you or your student is facing Title IX charges or sexual misconduct allegations at Albright College, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.