Stony Brook University: Sexual Misconduct and Title IX Defense

Stony Brook University, otherwise known as the State University of New York (SUNY) at Stony Brook, is a renowned public research university and the largest (by property) public university in New York (with over 1,400 acres of land). The Stony Brook Seawolves compete in Division 1 of the NCAA, and the school has been affiliated with five Fields Medalists (a prestigious mathematics award).

Chances are, if you're at Stony Brook, you have worked diligently to get there. You have a lot to lose if you're facing allegations of sexual misconduct or Title IX offenses. This article will examine what Title IX is, how Stony Brook differentiates between Title IX and sexual misconduct, and how they handle both of these types of accusations. You or your loved one does not have to navigate this challenging circumstance alone. An expert attorney advisor will most likely benefit you greatly.

How are Title IX and College Sexual Misconduct Policies Different at Stony Brook University?

At Stony Brook University, there is a distinction between Title IX offenses and procedures and sexual misconduct offenses and procedures. Stony Brook has created an overview that distinguishes the differences between the two. And, the Stony Brook University Code of Student Responsibility states, “Sexual misconduct that falls outside the scope of the University's Title IX policy is prohibited as it violates this Code.” This policy was adapted after the May 2020 Department of Education statement.

As per that statement, Title IX offenses at Stony Brook must occur physically, “On-campus premises, premises that SBU has “substantial control over,” or activity occurring within the SBU hardware, software and internet network.” Additionally, the definition of sexual assault is such that the offense must be severe and pervasive, rather than severe or pervasive; another aspect of this adjustment is that Title IX applies to “objectively offensive” rather than the “subjective standard” that falls within the purview of the sexual misconduct process.

The overview goes on to differentiate between the steps in the investigatory stage for both offenses and then speaks to the determination and hearing procedures. Make sure to take a look at the chart so you are familiar with the differences in each step.

What Sanctions Might Stony Brook Impose?

There is a long list of potential sanctions that the Review Panel can recommend to the Vice President of Student Affairs or the Assistant Vice President for Equity and Access. The options include:

  • Written warnings
  • Restitution
  • Special restriction (access to locations) or loss of privileges
  • Residential probation
  • University probation
  • University Service & Educational Projects and Programs
  • Residential Service & Educational Projects and Programs
  • Suspension from Residence Halls
  • Expulsion from Residence Halls
  • Suspension from the University
  • Expulsion from the University
  • Restriction from personal contact

Although this list seems to offer a smorgasbord of sanctions, most frequently, if the offense is severe, the sanctions will be suspension or expulsion. Additionally, under the definition for non-consensual sexual intercourse and/or penetration, the policy states, “This also includes what may be referred to as sexual assault, which is also commonly known as “rape,” whether forcible, or non-forcible, “date rape” and “acquaintance rape.” For parties found responsible for Non-consensual sexual intercourse and/or penetration, the available sanctions are suspension with additional requirements and expulsion” (emphasis added).

Is There a Long-Term Impact for College Sexual Misconduct?

If Stony Brook University finds that a student is guilty of sexual misconduct or Title IX violations, there are the immediate sanctions, such as suspension and expulsion. The sanctions can have a snowball effect, however, and impact more beyond just one's attendance at school. The finding could make it challenging to transfer to another school, to gain admittance to a graduate program, such as law school or medical school, and you could increase your financial burden if your financial aid package is affected by the expulsion or suspension. Frequently, aid is based on enrollment status, so if you are not enrolled in classes that semester, your aid could be at risk.

How are Allegations Investigated and Decided on?

Although the aforementioned chart offers an overview of the two processes, in this section, we'll include a few more specifics. For the process, the expected time frame is 90 calendar days from the receipt of the complaint to the determination of a finding. It is possible that interim measures will be put into place. That could include temporary restriction from personal contact, although you should not reach out to your accuser, regardless. It could also include:

  • Interim suspension
  • Alternate academic scheduling
  • Campus restrictions
  • Technological restrictions
  • Housing restrictions
  • Employment restrictions

Informal resolutions are only available for sexual misconduct cases (not Title IX) and only in instances where the Office of Equity and Access “believes that mediation would be an appropriate option for resolution.”

At the hearing itself, there are a few key differences to be aware of. In sexual misconduct cases, it's possible to waive the right to a live hearing; this is not an option for Title IX. On the other hand, lie detector evidence is allowable for a Title IX case, and parties who do not agree to cross-examination will have their statements waived. These are not applicable to sexual misconduct cases.

What is the Appeal Process at Stony Brook University?

The appeal process at Stony Brook is available to sexual misconduct cases in instances where there was a procedural error, new evidence is available, or the sanction was disproportionate with the charge. To pursue an appeal, students must submit a written application within seven days of receiving the findings of the hearing. If everything is submitted on time and one of the permissible grounds is true, then the Appeals Panel will review the file and provide the student with a written decision.

Choose an Experienced Attorney-Advisor for Your Stony Brook University Defense

If you or your loved one has to manage Title IX or sexual misconduct allegations, you don't have to walk the path alone. Protect your future by finding an attorney-advisor with national experience. Attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm have many years of experience successfully defending students. To learn more about how you can protect your future, call the Lento Law Firm at 888.535.3686 or reach out online.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.