Pennsylvania Colleges and Universities - Title IX Disciplinary Procedures

Pennsylvania colleges and universities may share similarities in how Title IX charges are investigated and adjudicated, but every school is different.  Some schools use a "single investigator" model, others use a "hearing panel" model, and others yet use a "blended" model which incorporates elements of both.  Even among colleges and universities that use the same Title IX disciplinary model, critical differences exist as to each schools' specific Title IX disciplinary procedures. 

Regardless of the disciplinary model used at your or your student's particular school, federal Title IX policies mandate swift disciplinary proceedings in cases where sexual misconduct, including sexual harassment, assault, or violence, has been alleged, and findings need only be supported by a preponderance of the evidence, a standard far below “beyond a reasonable doubt” that is afforded in criminal courtrooms.  Because of the significant federal funding at stake, most colleges and universities in Pennsylvania have made their Title IX disciplinary policies comply with federal mandates, and by doing so, have continued to diminish the procedural safeguards afforded to accused students.

In addition, campus Title IX proceedings are generally conducted and adjudicated by panels of students, faculty, and/or administrators with little or no training in due process, investigatory practice, rules of evidence, or civil procedure. As a result, students accused of sexual misconduct are increasingly facing life-altering negative consequences when found “responsible” for alleged sexual misconduct.  Allegations alone can create serious issues for accused students, and consequences resulting from a finding of responsibility can include suspension, expulsion, the loss of scholarships, the reporting of disciplinary charges on their permanent student record that often must be disclosed when applying to graduate schools for example, or when pursuing professional employment.  With so much at stake, it cannot be ignored that schools do make mistakes; indeed, the number of colleges and universities being investigated by the federal government for missteps in such matters has tripled since 2011; 11 of which are under present investigation in Pennsylvania.

Despite the potential inadequacies of how a particular school handles sexual misconduct allegations, ultimately, to achieve the best possible result when facing such allegations, students and parents must understand how their school investigates and adjudicates Title IX violations, and must take the proper steps as early as possible in the process to protect the accused student's interests.

The following list of Pennsylvania colleges and universities provides specific information as to each schools' Title IX disciplinary model and procedures:

Contact Us Today!

Footer 2

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu