How do low evidentiary standards harm accused individuals?

The problem with low evidentiary standards is that it's a low burden that the accusing party has to meet. It could involve a Title IX case, academic misconduct, a general disciplinary issue, but when it's a low burden that has to be met, it's arguably not a fair process for the accused. As bad as it is to be a criminal defendant, the burden of proof is much higher beyond a reasonable doubt. There's also many additional procedural safeguards and rights that a criminal defendant has. In a campus disciplinary proceeding, in addition to the low burden of proof, there's many other potential flaws in the process that can allow for an unfavorable outcome if not properly addressed.

Everything has to be done to work, unfortunately, within this flawed system. These cases can be won, but unfortunately, the consequences can be severe and if not properly handled, and that's how a person can be harmed by having these flaws in the system, including, arguably, a low burden of proof and in most schools, it's by preponderance of the evidence. An experienced attorney can help understand the process, can help advise and protect a student's rights and interests and should be involved as early as possible in the process.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.