What is considered retaliation under the Title IX Final Rule?

Retaliation under the Title IX Final Rule can encompass various forms. It would be impossible to completely define. Retaliation can be, for example, if a teacher or professor is accused of sexually harassing a student, and then if the professor were to give that student if for some reason the professor was still in the capacity to grade that student a lower grade, the allegation could be made that that was retaliation.

If, for example, a respondent accused of sexual harassment, sexual misconduct, and if that student filed a Title IX complaint against the complainant for concerns of his or her own in a sense of the respondent's own grievances towards the complainant. Although it should not be the case, the school may regard that as retaliation. If the respondent, for example, were to pursue a defamation case against the complainant, is there a lawful right to do so?

My concern would be that a school can regard that as retaliation. It's fluid in terms of what could or would be considered retaliation, it would be a case in fact-specific. Retaliation is a serious allegation unto itself, it's a serious potential charge. A person has to be extremely mindful not to be in the position of being accused of retaliation and having an experienced attorney advisor can help you best understand what's at stake, and can help you understand and navigate the process. They should be involved as early as possible in a Title IX sexual misconduct case.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.