Mansfield University of Pennsylvania Title IX Violations

Mansfield University of Pennsylvania takes instances of sexual misconduct very seriously. When an incident of sexual misconduct arises within the University's student body, it will be pursued for disciplinary action under the University's Student Code of Conduct. There are special procedures utilized for sexual misconduct that do not apply for standard behavioral misconduct violations.

Title IX Violations at Mansfield University of Pennsylvania

The University begins the process for investigating Title IX violations when a report is filed against a student for an incident of sexual misconduct. Throughout the process, the student who initiated the complaint will be known as the "complainant," while the student who is facing allegations will be known as the "respondent." When a complaint is filed, the Title IX Coordinator will conduct an immediate assessment of the situation to see if any interim measures should be taken against the respondent. These measures can include relocation of housing, change in class schedules, or even a suspension. The investigation will be conducted by University officials and will consist of a series of separate interviews with the complainant, respondent and any witnesses suggested.


After the investigative process has concluded, the University will hold a hearing for a student as outlined within the Student Code of Conduct. Hearings will be led by the Chief Conduct Officer, who will act similarly to a prosecutor, while simultaneously conducting the order of the hearing. Hearings are decided upon by a Student Conduct Board. There is no specific agenda for the hearing, however, both complainant and respondent will, in theory, be guaranteed certain rights throughout the process. Both parties are welcome to present their own supporting witnesses and evidence for the hearing. Both parties may cross-examine witnesses unless the opposing party is acting as a witness. If this is the case, then questioning must be done indirectly through the Conduct Officer or Chair of the board. Members of the hearing board may also question witnesses, as well as the opposing parties. The report from the Title IX investigation will be presented to the board as well for consideration. The Chief Conduct Officer, along with both parties, will be permitted to make closing statements. Following the closing statements, the hearing will be closed and the board will deliberate. Decisions will be made using the standard of a preponderance of the evidence.

At hearings, students are permitted the assistance and presence of an advisor. Sexual misconduct allegations have far reaching consequences that can severely and negatively impact a student's academic and professional goals. For this reason, students should select an attorney to serve as their advisor throughout the hearing process. Attorneys can provide students with specialized defensive courtroom knowledge that can impact the outcome of a hearing. In addition, students may face additional consequences from the initial reporting of the sexual misconduct at Mansfield University; should anything arise, an attorney will be able to help them through these potential consequences.

Appeals at Mansfield University

In the event of an unfavorable outcome, students will be entitled to an appeal. Appeals must be submitted within ten (10) days following the decision. The grounds for appeal are whether the decision is in accordance with the facts, procedural errors, inappropriate sanctions, or new information.

If you or your student is facing sexual misconduct allegations or Title IX charges at Mansfield University, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.