New York Schools

New York State is home to over 200 different major institutions of higher learning. There are an estimated 880,000 students attending these schools on a full-time basis. College and university administrators are responsible for creating some form of written code that defines behavioral expectations and prohibited conduct. The majority of schools implement codes of conduct that pertain to academics, campus residency, compliance with federal Title IX provisions, and more.

The rules and provisions are generally geared to promote an overall commitment to academic integrity, equality, and inclusiveness. Students who are alleged to have demonstrated acts of misconduct are subject to the policies and procedures regarding disciplinary action. In most of these cases, designated members of the administration are responsible for investigating. The accused is typically provided an opportunity to answer the allegations in some type of hearing.

The Lento Law Firm is preeminent in the realm of legal practice that involves student disciplinary defense. This specialty area is distinct from civil and criminal legal actions. College students and their families are making sacrifices and committing significant resources such as time and money toward their educational pursuits. Those who are facing violations such as those of academic or sexual misconduct may see their goals adversely impacted if sanctions and penalties are imposed.

Common Allegations of General Misconduct

Most schools address the many aspects that relate to codes of conduct initially with students as part of the admittance process. In addition, access to the most recent version of the rules and procedures are generally available on the school's website. Some of the most common allegations of misconduct are as follows:

  • Violations of the institution's drug and/or alcohol rules and restrictions. These forms of misconduct are most common among those who reside in campus housing or other University-owned residential settings. Examples include underage drinking, possession of alcohol in areas where it is prohibited, and using false identification.
  • Forms of hazing are common among student clubs, groups, and organizations. Hazing involves subjecting a student to some form of treatment that is degrading, humiliating, or otherwise uncomfortable.
  • Using fireworks or other explosive devices or materials
  • Creating a nuisance that disturbs others on the campus such as through excessive noise or music.

Understanding Academic Misconduct

The leadership at colleges and universities generally emphasizes maintaining academic integrity. Violations of academic misconduct such as cheating are viewed as a failure to maintain ethical standards. Some of the most common examples are as follows:

  • Plagiarism: Using someone else's words or ideas improperly. A student may present the work of others as if it was their own and/or fail to reference or give credit to the source.
  • Collaborative cheating: Engaging with other students in acts such as providing or receiving assistance during an exam or sharing a copy of an upcoming quiz or exam.
  • Having someone else take an examination in your place.
  • Submitting a paper, report, or assignment that was prepared by others as if it was your own work.
  • Improperly accessing and altering student grades or records.

Title IX Violations at New York Colleges and Universities

In 1972, the U.S. Department of Education implemented legislation that required all academic institutions to adopt and maintain compliance with Title IX provisions. This federally-based initiative is a requirement for all schools that receive federal funding for education. The rules prohibit any forms of sexually-based discrimination.

Title IX Compliance

Colleges and universities have a Title IX Coordinator who is responsible for ongoing training and educational activities. Violations of these rules include acts of sexual assault, gender bias, and sexual harassment. The rules are applicable to students, faculty, and staff. Violators of these rules are likely to face harsh sanctions including suspension or dismissal from the institution.

Student Disciplinary Process

Schools are given some latitude to design their disciplinary processes; however, there are some similarities among most. Complaints or allegations received by staff are supposed to be followed up on in a reasonably timely manner.

Investigation of Complaint

The first phase of the disciplinary process is investigative. A designated administrator(s) will interview the parties involved and gather any evidence. The alleged victim(s), reporting party, and any witnesses will generally have their privacy protected. Any types of retaliation or intimidation of these parties are strictly prohibited. If the administration deems that evidence suggests that the violation(s) occurred, they will initiate further disciplinary proceedings and notify the accused.

Right to an Advisor

Throughout the disciplinary process, all parties are entitled to be accompanied by one advisor. This individual may join the parties at any meetings or hearings. Students facing serious allegations are strongly recommended to seek legal counsel that will function in this capacity.

Disciplinary Hearings

Schools develop their own procedures for how disciplinary hearings are conducted. Generally, the parties and any witnesses may be subject to questioning. Those hearing the matter will review and consider all evidence. The evidentiary standard used is typically by the preponderance of the evidence.

Potential Penalties/Sanctions

The school's written guidelines will contain the potential sanctions that may be imposed such as:

  • An order to make restitution or imposing fines or other monetary penalties
  • The student may be placed on a period of probation
  • Students may be required to undergo counseling or complete hours of community service
  • They may lose eligibility to reside in campus housing
  • A temporary suspension from the university may be imposed
  • Expulsion

Appeals Process

Those found to have committed a violation will be afforded an opportunity to appeal. there are usually only a couple of grounds that may justify an appeal. The accused may assert that there was a failure to adhere to written procedures. An appeal may be justified if new evidence has emerged. The severity of the sanctions imposed may be the focus of an appeal as well.

Importance of Having an Attorney

There are several potential benefits of having legal representation when facing disciplinary actions. Your attorney may recognize potential flaws or inconsistencies within the evidence or witness testimony. The attorney will likely ensure you are well prepared for your hearing. This preparation may involve creating highly effective statements and being prepared to respond to questions you are likely to encounter. Your attorney may engage the administration in negotiations regarding a mutually acceptable resolution as well.

Attorney in New York Represents Students Facing Allegations of Misconduct

Joseph D. Lento aggressively defends students accused of violations of the code of conduct including academic or sexual misconduct. It is important to consult with an attorney in a timely manner, as these matters often proceed quickly. We encourage you to contact the office today at (888) 535-3686.

Are you a student or the parent of a student at a New York college or university facing a school-related issue?  Attorney Joseph D. Lento can help.  Click on the following links as applicable for more information:

Joseph D. Lento has helped many students and others in academia in New York protect their academic and professional future.  Contact him today at 888-535-3686.

Contact Us Today!

Footer 2

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu