Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine Title IX Violations

Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, also known as PCOM, takes all instances of sexual misconduct that arise within its student body very seriously. The College upholds a Title IX policy to address and discipline instances of sexual misconduct that are reported to College officials. The process used for instances of sexual misconduct is different than that used for instances of standard misconduct, and greater scrutiny will be applied.

PCOM Title IX Procedures

The process for resolving sexual misconduct begins when a report is submitted to a PCOM official. Complaints of this nature will always make their way to the Title IX Office for a full review. Throughout the process, the student that initiated the complaint will be known as the "complainant," while the student who is facing the allegations will be known as the "respondent." The College has a policy prohibiting any form of retaliation against complainants and may impose interim measures to ensure that this does not take place. This can include rescheduling of classes, or a temporary suspension from College participation. Once a complaint is processed, the Title IX office opens an investigation to determine if formal resolutions are necessary, and to also obtain facts pertaining to the incident. An Alternative Dispute Resolution process is available in certain situations, and will normally feature guided mediation, and restorative measures. This is not available for allegations of sexual assault.

Formal Resolutions

In a Formal Resolution process, the respondent will first be asked to attend a preliminary meeting to discuss the process and review the complaint. After the meeting, a sexual misconduct board hearing will take place. The hearing agenda is set by the board, however, the complainant and respondent will, in theory, be guaranteed certain rights. Both sides may bring supporting witnesses. In addition, respondents may respond to all claims against them to an appropriate degree. The board will determine whether or not a violation has taken place using the standard of a "preponderance of evidence."

At hearings, students are permitted to be accompanied by an advisor of their own choosing. Sexual misconduct allegations are particularly serious circumstances. The mere reporting of these allegations can cause very long-term negative consequences on a student's academic and professional goals. For this reason, students should select an attorney to serve as their advisor throughout the investigative and hearing process. An attorney can provide students with specialized courtroom knowledge and tactics that can make a major impact in a hearing and can protect a student's interests throughout the Title IX disciplinary process. In addition, if any adverse consequences follow the initial reporting of the allegations at Philadelphia College of Medicine, an attorney can serve as a guide to students through these potential resulting consequences.

Appeals at PCOM

In the event of an unfavorable outcome, students can make an appeal. Appeals must be submitted within five (5) business days of the outcome. The grounds for appeal are procedural error, new evidence, a claim of a lack of substantial information for the decision, or a claim of an overly severe sanction.

If you or your student is facing allegations of sexual misconduct or Title IX charges at PCOM, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.