La Roche College Title IX Violations

La Roche College does not tolerate acts of sexual misconduct within its student body. The College holds a policy against sexual misconduct within its Student Handbook. The handbook contains information on what actions will constitute sexual misconduct, as well as what actions the College takes for administering disciplinary measures for students who have been alleged to violate the policy. The disciplinary process will mirror that used for incidents of standard misconduct, however, certain special measures may be taken due to the nature of these incidents.

La Roche College Sexual Misconduct Process

The process for investigating and resolving acts of sexual misconduct will begin once a student reports allegations to the College. The College will begin an investigation into the misconduct to gather the facts necessary for the student to be brought to a hearing. During the investigation, if it is deemed appropriate, the student may be subjected to certain interim measures. These can include changes to residence assignments, class schedule, or even a temporary suspension from College activity. Once the investigation has concluded, the Title IX Coordinator will convene a hearing board to make a decision on the sexual misconduct case.


Once an investigation has concluded and is set to go to a hearing, a hearing authority will be chosen. For more serious violations, the matter will be directed to a hearing board, the members of which will be chosen by the Title IX Coordinator. At a hearing, the student who files the complaint will be known as "the complainant," while the student facing charges will be known as the "student charged." Hearings will begin with the chairperson of the board reading the charges, and the student charged entering a plea. Next, the complainant will introduce their supporting evidence, witnesses, and argument, which will be cross-examined by the board. Following this stage, the student charged will do the same, subject to the same cross-examinations from the board members. The student charged will then have an opportunity to make closing remarks, and the hearing will close for deliberation. The board will make a decision by a majority vote, using the standard of "a preponderance of the evidence" to make their individual decisions.

Students are entitled to an advisor of their own choosing, however, in most cases, the advisor must be from the College community. Sexual misconduct allegations, due to their serious nature and potentially severe consequences, may warrant a special circumstance for the student to select a member from outside the community. In either case, it is critical that students facing allegations obtain an attorney's counsel either at their side if permitted, or behind the scenes of the College's investigation. An attorney will make sure that a student's rights remain protected and can even help a student prepare evidence and argument for their case. An attorney can also ensure that the integrity of the College's Title IX investigation and disciplinary proceedings is upheld. In addition, should any adverse consequences follow the initial reporting of the allegations at La Roche College, an attorney can serve as a legal guide.

Appeals at La Roche College

In the event of an unfavorable outcome, students have a chance to make an appeal. Appeals must be submitted within 72 hours of the hearing decision. The grounds for appeal are unfairness in the hearing, a decision contrary to evidence, inappropriate sanctions, and new evidence.

If you or your student is currently facing sexual misconduct allegations or Title IX charges at La Roche College, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.