Westminster College

Westminster College makes uses a Student Code of Conduct to govern its student body. the Code itself is located within Westminster's student handbook. Students who are suspected of violating the Code will be tried by the College's Judicial Process. If a student is found to be responsible for a violation, they will have sanctions imposed upon them by the College as punishment.

When a report of a violation is filed against a student, the process begins. Students will receive notice of violation accusations in writing, along with an invitation to a pre-hearing conference with an assigned hearing officer.

Pre-Hearing Conference

The Pre-Hearing Conference is a brief meeting between an accused student and the hearing officer following a report of an alleged violation. The purpose of the conference is to explain the judicial process, present the student with allegations against them, review the facts of the reports, and allow for an informal discussion of the matters with the hearing officer. After the conference has concluded, the student will then be able to select which manner to proceed: either an Administrative Hearing or a College Judicial Board Hearing.

Administrative Hearing

An Administrative Hearing can be used when it is requested, or if the student admits responsibility during the Pre-Hearing Conference. Further discussion and investigation will be conducted if necessary. The hearing officer will use their own judgement to make a decision of the student's responsibility. Decisions are to be made using the standard of "more likely than not." The hearing officer can move the case to a College Judicial Board Hearing at any time if deemed necessary.

College Judicial Board Hearing

The full College Judicial Board consists of 8 total members: 4 faculty members, 4 students. The presence of only 5 of the 8 members is necessary to conduct a case. For each hearing, the board led by a chair. The chair will only vote in the event of a tie.

The chair will open the hearing by informing all participants of the processes. At hearings, students can present witnesses to support their case. They can also question any other witness testimony, and dispute any other written or physical evidence. Once all information has been heard, the board will excuse all participants. The board's decision will be made by majority vote. The standard of "more likely than not" will be used in deliberations. If the board finds that a student is responsible for a violation, they will recommend sanctions to the Vice President. The Vice President decides what sanctions are appropriate.

Students are entitled to the presence of an adviser of their choosing, however, there are some limitations. Attorneys are unable to attend hearings unless the hearing is related to criminal charges. Even without attending, an attorney providing support from behind the scenes can be incredibly beneficial to a student at a hearing. Attorneys can offer valuable insight into courtroom techniques for evidence presentation, cross-examination, and argument construction that can be incredibly helpful when applied to the student's hearing.

Westminster College Appeals

If the hearing results in an unfavorable outcome, students may make an appeal. Appeals must be made within 7 days of the decision. The grounds for appeal are a violation of proper procedures, a claim that student did not violate the code, or unjust sanctions. If the appeal is approved, an Appeal Hearing will take place in front of the College Appeals Board. If the Appeal Hearing does not result in a favorable outcome, a secondary appeal can be made to the President of the College on the same grounds.

If you or your student is currently facing disciplinary action from Westminster College, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!

Footer 2

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu