Villanova University

Villanova University governs its student body through its Code of Student Conduct. The Code of Student Conduct is located within the University's Student Handbook. The Code of Student Conduct is in place to ensure that students do not exhibit behaviors that endanger or otherwise interfere with a safe and comfortable learning environment. When a student violates the code, they will subject to a disciplinary process, and may incur sanctions imposed by the University as punishment.

The process begins when a complaint is filed against a student. Complaints can be filed by any member of the University community, and can be filed to the Dean of Students Office, the Department of Public Safety, or the Office of Residence Life.

In any disciplinary proceedings, the person who initiated the complaint will be known as the "complainant," and the one who is the subject of the complaint will be known as the "respondent."

Villanova Conduct Review Officer Meeting

The next step in the disciplinary process is a meeting with a Conduct Review Officer. Meetings will be of an informal nature, and are meant to educate the student on what they may encounter and also provide opportunity for early resolution. The Conduct Review officer can resolve lower level offenses at the meeting, and can also decide what cases move forward to the Conduct Review Board. Informal resolutions may be used for sanctions that are less than a written warning.

University Conduct Review Board Hearing

The University Conduct Review Board will be comprised of 1 member of the student body, 1 faculty member, and 1 administration member, selected by the Dean of Students. Each member is not to have any conflict of interest with either the complainant or respondent, and all boards will always have a member of the student body on them.

At the hearing, the complainant and respondent will present their statements and relevant witnesses to support their own side of the case. Both parties must direct their questions to the Board, who will then ask questions to witnesses. Likewise, witnesses are to direct their comments and responses to the Board. If the complainant and respondent wish to question each other, they must also direct their questions to the Board. The purpose of this indirect questioning is to prevent the fostering of an adversarial environment, however it can also lead to questions being misconstrued or re-worded by the Board. The Board will ultimately decide what questions are appropriate and relevant to the case. After all of the information has been presented, the complainant and respondent will be able to make their final comments to the Board. Finally, the Board will deliberate privately using the standard of a "preponderance of evidence" to make their decision.

The University restricts attendance of Board hearings to only members of the University community that were involved with the incident in question. In spite of this, receiving outside counsel from an attorney will still be a great source of help to students. Attorneys will be able to provide help from behind the scenes to prepare students for what they may be facing in these hearings. In addition to this, attorneys are experts of evidence presentation and examination, and will pass on some of these techniques to students so they may use them in their hearings.

An Experienced Attorney's Role When Representing a Villanova University Student

Villanova University and a student's attorney may be able to work together to achieve an agreeable resolution before non-academic disciplinary charges and/or academic misconduct charges are filed in certain instances.  If charges have already been filed against a student, the accused student's attorney, also in certain instances, may be able to serve as an a advocate between Villanova University, the accused student, and other involved parties, in an effort to achieve a constructive resolution.  Whether before or after non-academic disciplinary charges and/or academic misconduct charges are filed, the extent of an attorney's involvement will be at the discretion of Villanova University.

A student attorney's involvement at Villanova University in matters involving non-academic disciplinary charges and/or academic misconduct charges should not be confused with Villanova University disciplinary cases involving Title IX sexual misconduct allegations.  In Title IX student disciplinary proceedings, an experienced attorney must work both as the point of contact between the accused student and Villanova University as well as behind the scenes to defend against sexual misconduct / sexual assault allegations.


In the event of an unfavorable outcome, students may make an appeal. All appeals go to the Dean of Students. and are divided into two distinct categories

An appeal for a new disciplinary hearing will grant the student a new hearing, if successful. The grounds for this appeal are a defect in procedure, or new evidence to be considered. These appeals must be within 2 business days of receiving the notification of the original outcome.

An appeal for a review of sanctions will grant students different sanctions if successful. These appeals must be made within 2 business days of the notification of the original outcome, and must state clearly why the assigned sanctions are disproportionate to the offense.

If you or your student is currently facing disciplinary action from Villanova University, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.