Title IX law is in constant flux, with new rules and legal challenges continuing to shape how schools, colleges, and other institutions handle sex-based misconduct and discrimination.  Our firm closely monitors these developments and is committed to providing the most current information available. Click here to learn about the current state of Title IX and how we can help if you are facing accusations or other Title IX issues. 

Under the Title IX Final Rule, relevant cross-examination questions are allowed at a live hearing. A relevant question is a question that when asked would make it more likely to lead to a determination regarding the issue in dispute. The cross-examination question would have to be asked directly, orally, and in real-time by the party’s adviser, and never by the party personally. Before a question is to be answered the decision-maker needs to make a determination regarding whether the question is relevant.

If it’s relevant, it would need to be answered. If it’s deemed to be irrelevant, an explanation as to why the decision maker has deemed it to be irrelevant needs to be stated on the record. Questions that challenge a party’s credibility would also be allowed under the Title IX Final Rule.

Having an experienced attorney advisor will be your best ally if facing a Title IX hearing, and they should be involved in as early as possible in a case.