Gettysburg College

Gettysburg College governs its student body using its Code of Conduct. The Code of Conduct and its procedures are located in the Handbook of Student Rights and Responsibilities. Students who are suspected of behavior that is contrary to what is outlined in the Code will be charged with violations. Students suspected of violations will undergo the Code of Conduct Process. If a student is found to be responsible for a violation, they will have sanctions imposed on them by the College.

A complaint against a student can be filed by any member of the College. Once a complaint is filed, the Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities determines whether or not Code of Conduct charges are appropriate for the matter. The Director will also choose the hearing body when appropriate. The hearing body will be either the Student Conduct Administrator or the Student Conduct Review Board. The Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities may also conduct an investigation for merit before making any determinations.

Cases that are assigned to a Student Conduct Administrator follow a much more informal process than those assigned to the Student Conduct Review Board. The Student Conduct Administrator will decide both the outcome of the case and the sanctions. The student can also admit to the violations they are charged with. If the violations are accepted but not the sanctions assigned, the appeal is limited to the scope of sanction appropriateness.

Gettysburg College Student Conduct Hearing Process

Student Conduct Review Board hearings are meant to resolve the situation between the "complainant" (the person who initiated the complaint) and the "respondent" (the student facing charges). Prior to the hearing both parties can request the removal of board members based on suspicions of a member's bias. Hearings will follow procedure as determined by the board presiding over them. In general, the complainant and the respondent will each have the opportunity to present written and physical evidence. Both parties can also present supporting witnesses for themselves, who the board will question following testimony. Witnesses cannot be questioned by the complainant or respondent directly. Instead, both parties must question the witnesses through the board, by suggesting questions that the board will ask. After all the information has been heard and all questioning has concluded, the board will deliberate. Decisions will be made using a majority vote. Deliberations are to use standard of "more likely than not."

Students are entitled to the assistance of an advisor, however, there is one unfortunate caveat: the advisor must be a member of the College community. While this may seem helpful, a member of the College community is unlikely the have the same level of student defense experience and dedication to a student's case as an attorney will. Even without attending a hearing, an attorney's help from behind the scenes can be a great resource for students facing a hearing. Attorneys will be able to offer students keen insight into courtroom tactics that, when applied to a college disciplinary hearing, can be incredibly effective at securing a more favorable outcome.

Gettysburg College Appeals

Should a hearing result in an unfavorable outcome for any reason, students are able to make an appeal. Students have 5 calendar days from the date of the decision to make an appeal to the Vice President for College Life & Dean of Students. Appeals must be on the grounds of unreasonable sanctions, procedural error, or new information.

If you or your student is currently facing disciplinary action from Gettysburg College, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.