Marywood University

Marywood University governs its student body using a broad Code of Conduct. The Code of Conduct contains a list of Policies that are intended to keep the day to day business of the University in order. Students who do not adhere to the policies set forth may be charged with violations. The Conduct process begins when an incident report is filed against a student, accusing them of violations. After this, pending an investigation, the student will be notified of a time and date of a Preliminary Hearing.

Marywood University Preliminary Hearing

At a Preliminary Hearing, an individual known as the Preliminary Hearing Officer will meet with the accused student. The overall goal of a Preliminary Hearing is to inform the accused student of Conduct Policies and Procedures, and to make an initial finding to hold the student responsible or not responsible for violations. Accused students can request further adjudication if they do not agree with the finding, but they must request a Formal Hearing within 3 days after the initial Preliminary Hearing. If the student agrees to accept responsibility but wants to reconsider the sanction, they must also make a request for reconsideration within 3 days after the sanctions were communicated to them.

Formal Hearings

Formal hearings will be adjudicated by one of two hearing authorities:

Administrative Hearing Officer: An Administrative Hearing Officer may be the same Preliminary Hearing Officer if the student agrees to it. The Administrative Hearing Officer may also be the Senior Director for Student Conduct and Residence Life, or a specified designee.

Conduct Board: The Conduct Board as a whole consists of 15 members: 6 faculty, 6 undergraduate students, and 3 graduate students. For each hearing, a panel of 2 faculty and 3 students will be drawn to both adjudicate and decide the case. A student will be selected as a chair of the panel.

The hearing process remains the same whether the hearing is conducted by a panel or an officer. Hearings open with charges being presented by the hearing authority. Both parties involved will have the opportunity to present witnesses, whose relevance will be determined by the hearing authority. The board or officer will render a decision once all of the facts have been heard out.

The University typically keeps hearings between University personnel and the students involved in the matter. Students will have the opportunity to have a University-affiliated adviser who will either be a student or a faculty member, however, this adviser will likely lack the necessary experience or desire to bolster a strong defense at the hearing. An attorney can help students from behind the scenes. An attorney can offer a student helpful insight on courtroom tactics, and evidence presentation that they will not find anywhere else. Use of these strategies can strongly affect the outcome of the case.

Marywood University Appeals

In the event of an unfavorable outcome, students have 5 business days to make an appeal to the Assistant Vice President for Student Life. The grounds for appeal are: the hearing was inconsistent with the process outlined in the Code, the sanctions imposed were arbitrary or capricious, relevant evidence was not reviewed, or new evidence has become available. Appeals may sometimes be reviewed by an Appeals Board which is made up of members selected from the Conduct Board.

If you or your student is facing disciplinary action from Marywood University, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.