University Of The Sciences Title IX Violations

University of the Sciences in Philadelphia takes incidents of sexual misconduct very seriously within its student body. The University upholds a Sexual Misconduct Policy that is used to administer discipline and adjudicate cases of sexual misconduct. The procedures for pursuing University disciplinary action on instances of sexual misconduct mirror those used for standard misconduct but are held to a greater deal of scrutiny from the University.

University of the Sciences Sexual Misconduct Process

The process for disciplining acts of sexual misconduct begins once a report is filed with a University Official for sexual misconduct. The student filing the report is known as the "complainant," while the student who is facing misconduct charges will be known as the "respondent." Once a report is received, the University will begin a Title IX investigation into the matters to gather the facts. Both complainant and respondent will be given the opportunity to review the results of the investigation prior to a hearing. If it is believed that a respondent has the potential to interfere with the investigation, or otherwise poses a threat to the University community as a whole, there may be certain interim measures imposed. These can include rescheduling of classes, changes in housing, or even a temporary suspension until the investigation and hearing process has concluded and the situation is resolved. Once enough information has been gathered, the University will initiate the hearing process.

Hearings

Hearings will be held and decided upon by the Student Conduct Committee. The Student Conduct Committee will be led by a Chair. Hearings do not follow a particular schedule but instead, proceed according to the will of the Chair. Although the Chair will decide the flow of a hearing, both parties are in theory granted certain rights that the Chair must allow them to exercise at hearings. Both parties will be allowed to have their own witnesses, provided that they are approved by the Chair. Parties are entitled to present their own version of events, as well as question witnesses and one another, but only as permitted by the Chair. The Chair may alter the general process of the hearing as necessary to protect the safety needs of the complainant. Once the Chair deems all relevant information has been heard, the hearing will close, and the Committee will deliberate. Decisions will be made using the standard of "more likely than not."

The University allows students to select a Conduct Advisor from the University community. Under certain circumstances, the advisor may be an attorney, however, students may also receive support from an attorney from behind the scenes. Sexual misconduct allegations are incredibly serious and can have lifetime consequences on a student's goals. For this reason, an attorney's counsel should be sought as soon as a student faces allegations. Attorneys can protect a student's interests and provide specialized knowledge that can assist a student in their hearings. In addition, should any adverse consequences follow the initial reporting of the allegations at University of the Sciences, an attorney can guide students through these circumstances.

University of the Sciences Appeals

In the event of an unfavorable hearing outcome, students may make an appeal of the result. Appeals must be submitted within ten (10) working days of the outcome notification. The grounds for appeal are new information, procedural error, findings against the evidence, or excessive sanctions.

If you or your student is currently facing allegations of sexual misconduct or Title IX charges at University of the Sciences, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!

Footer 2

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu