New Jersey City Title IX Violations

New Jersey City University takes a strong stance against instances of sexual misconduct that occur within its student body. These incidents are disciplined through the University's Sexual Assault Policy. The University will adjudicate these incidents with much more severe scrutiny and disciplinary consequences than standard conduct violations.

Sexual Assault Hearings

When a student is reported for an act of sexual misconduct, the University, with the consent of the victim, will launch an investigation and begin the process for bringing disciplinary proceedings against a student. Students who initiate the report will be known as "complainant," while the student facing allegations will be known as the "accused." The accused student may face certain interim measures prior to the hearing, while the allegations are being investigated.

Accusations of sexual misconduct will be resolved through the formal hearing process. Hearings will be heard and decided by the Sexual Assault Hearing Committee, a group of individuals chosen with the help of the Title IX coordinator for handling cases of sexual misconduct. At hearings, a Presiding Officer will lead the board and conduct the direction of the hearing. Regardless of the order of that the hearing that the Presiding Officer decides, both the complainant and the accused will be given sufficient time to make their own respective cases. Both parties may present their own supporting witnesses, evidence, and arguments at hearings. The Presiding Officer may take certain precautions or other specific measures to ensure the safety of the complainant if necessary. After all relevant information has been heard by the Committee, they will retire for a period of deliberation. Decisions will be made using the standard of "more likely than not."

Students facing allegations of sexual misconduct will be permitted the assistance of an advisor through the investigation and hearing process. Sexual misconduct allegations can carry long-lasting effects that can seriously jeopardize a student's professional and academic goals. Because of the level of seriousness, students should select an attorney to serve as their advisor throughout the process. An attorney will be able to provide students with insight into courtroom tactics that can prove invaluable in a University hearing setting. Techniques such as witness examination and proper argument construction can give students a critical edge in their hearings, and ultimately affect the outcome. In addition to this, students may face adverse consequences stemming from the reporting of the incident at New Jersey City University. An attorney will be able to guide them through these consequences if necessary.


In the event of an unfavorable outcome, students have a chance at an appeal. Appeals must be submitted within seven (7) business days of the notification of the outcome. The grounds for appeal are a debate of the harshness of the sanction, procedural error, new evidence, or a claim that the outcome was not justified by the evidence introduced.

If you or your student is currently facing Title IX charges or allegations of sexual misconduct, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.