Neumann University Title IX Violations

Neumann University will pursue incidents of Sexual Misconduct with extreme diligence. The University enacts a Sexual Misconduct policy that outlines specific violations that can fall under this policy. The disciplinary process for incidents of sexual misconduct mirrors how the University handles instances of standard behavioral misconduct, however, the process is applied with greater scrutiny.

Neumann University Sexual Misconduct Disciplinary Process

The process for resolving complaints of sexual misconduct will begin when a complaint is filed with a University official. The student who files the complaint is referred to as the "accuser," while the student facing the accusations will be referred to as the "accused." The University will initiate an investigation into the incident to obtain the facts surrounding what happened. Investigations will consist of separate interviews with the accuser and the accused. The investigators will also contact witnesses and review relevant evidence suggested by either party. While the investigation taking place, the accuser may request an informal resolution if circumstances are appropriate. Informal resolutions are facilitated by the Title IX coordinator and are focused on a mediative approach, however, the matter may be elevated to a formal resolution at any time.

Formal Resolutions

Formal Hearings will be held and decided upon by the University's Sexual Misconduct Board. This board is specific to instances of sexual misconduct and consists of members assigned to resolving these incidents. Hearings do not have a particular agenda or set order, and will instead proceed according to the will of the Chair of the hearing board. Although there is no set order, both accused and accuser are in theory guaranteed certain rights at a hearing. Both parties may present their own witnesses and evidence to the board. The accused has the right to make responses to all opposing information and testimony presented, however, there is no right to cross-examination. The accused will also have a right to making a statement to summarize their case. Once all parties have been adequately heard out, as determined by the board, and all relevant witnesses and information has been presented, the board will close the hearing, and will begin deliberations. The decision of the outcome will be made using the standard of "a preponderance of evidence."

At hearings, students are granted the right to have an advisor. Depending on the circumstances, this advisor may need to come from the University community. Sexual misconduct allegations are very serious charges that can harm a student's future goals as a student and as a professional. For this reason, students should obtain the counsel of an attorney that may assist them from either behind the scenes or in the hearing, if applicable. Attorneys can help to make sure a student's rights are protected throughout the hearing process, and also provide advice to students on how to approach hearings. In addition, if any adverse consequences follow the initial reporting at Neumann University, an attorney can guide a student through these circumstances.

Appeals at Neumann University

In the event of an unfavorable hearing outcome, students may make an appeal. Appeals must be submitted within five (5) business days of the outcome. The grounds for making an appeal are overly severe sanctions, improper procedure, or new information.

If you or your student is currently facing sexual misconduct allegations or Title IX charges from Neumann University, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.