Waynesburg University Title IX Violations

Waynesburg University takes incidents of sexual misconduct that arise within its student body very seriously. The University upholds a policy against sexual misconduct within its Code of Conduct, which is enforced by the University's Title IX Office. The processes used to enact discipline on students who are alleged to have committed acts of sexual misconduct are different than those used for standard misconduct. In addition, these processes tend to carry much more gravity in the consequences if a student is held responsible for the violations.

Waynesburg University Sexual Misconduct Disciplinary Process

The process begins when a student files a report with a University official that may contain an instance of sexual misconduct. The complaint will be reviewed by a Title IX responsible employee to see if it warrants action under the sexual misconduct policy. Throughout the process, the student that files the complaint will be known as the "complainant," while the student who faces the allegations will be known simply as the "accused student." The University offers the potential for sexual misconduct incidents to be resolved through an informal process, however, the informal resolution process will not be used for incidents involving sexual violence or sexual assault. If an incident cannot be resolved informally, the University will initiate a formal investigation. In addition, if it is believed that a student poses a threat to the University community as a whole, the student may be subject to certain interim measures, such as changes to housing, or even a temporary suspension.

Formal Investigation

The Title IX Coordinator will appoint investigators, as deemed appropriate by the University, to handle the case. Investigators will meet with both parties, and will provide an opportunity for the parties to suggest witnesses for the case. Throughout the investigation, each party will be given an opportunity to respond to the other's evidence. All meetings with investigators will be conducted separately. After the investigative phase as concluded, the Title IX Coordinator will decide whether or not to move the case forward to a formal hearing.

Formal Hearing

Prior to a hearing being convened, both parties will have access to the information from the investigation, and a Moderator for the hearing will be assigned by the Title IX Coordinator. Hearings are decided by a panel of three individuals selected by the Title IX Coordinator. The hearing will proceed according to the will of the Moderator, however, students will, in theory, be guaranteed certain rights at the hearing. Witnesses presented at hearings may be questioned by both parties, however, neither party may question the other directly. The panel members may also question witnesses. In addition, both parties may make statements to the panel as well. The panel will render a decision using the standard of "a preponderance of evidence."

At hearings, students may be accompanied by a supporting individual, however, this person may only be an attorney if criminal charges are involved. Sexual misconduct allegations, even without criminal charges, can be incredibly serious. Consequences of these allegations can follow a student throughout their entire life. For example, if a student fails to take the necessary steps to properly defend against the sexual misconduct allegations and is found responsible, regardless of whether there are criminal charges or not, the finding of responsibility alone can greatly jeopardize the student's present circumstances and also their future prospects; both academically and professionally. Even if a student is not suspended or expelled from the University after a finding of responsibility, the finding alone is enough to significantly impede future goals because of disclosure issues. For these reasons, and also others, regardless of whether or not criminal charges are involved, students should retain the services of an attorney. An attorney can help protect a student's rights throughout the University's Title IX investigative and disciplinary process and can help students prepare for their hearings. In addition, if criminal charges are involved, students will already have an attorney to turn to for legal guidance.

Appeals at Waynesburg University

In the event of an unfavorable outcome, students are entitled to make an appeal. Appeals must be submitted within five (5) business days following the hearing. The grounds for appeal are a claim that University procedure was not followed, or that the decision was arbitrary and capricious.

If you or your student is facing sexual misconduct allegations or Title IX charges at Waynesburg University, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.