Seton Hall University Academic Misconduct Disciplinary Procedures

When accused of academic dishonesty at Seton Hall University, you face potential expulsion among a host of other penalties, depending on the severity of the offense you have been accused of. Each school/department within the university contains its own specific policy explaining the definitions and penalties you face when an instructor, fellow student or other school authority has accused you of academic misconduct. The Student Code of Conduct, in its discussion of academic integrity explicitly states: Each college or school within the University may choose to have its own definitions, standards, and policies relative to academic dishonesty and/or academic integrity. It shall be the decision of the appropriate Academic Dean as to which process to refer any matter under such policy.

Across the board, each department identifies cheating and plagiarism as distinct offenses that would warrant penalties. Some departments go into greater length and detail regarding the nature of the offenses they penalize. To access specific information about the definition of cheating, plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty in the department in which you have been accused, consult the department/major's unique policy on the topic. Some departments also penalize the facilitation of suspected acts of cheating/plagiarism, such as allowing a student to copy one's own work.

You may feel exceptionally nervous about the future of your academic career when you have been accused of this type of offense. To quell your doubts and uncertainties moving forward in the process, you are strongly advised to retain a student defense attorney to defend you against the misconduct allegation and its associated penalties.

The more informed you are as to the procedures for handling academic misconduct, the better your position is going forward. The less you know, the more likely you are to make a statement that could work against you or be construed as an admission. Alternatively, you will know if there are any discrepancies between the way the accusation has been handled thus far, and the proper procedure that is "on the books."

Seton Hall University Academic Integrity Violation Procedure

Seton Hall's academic misconduct disciplinary procedures are unique in the aspect that faculty members are encouraged to provide ample opportunity for collaborative resolution. Not many institutions approach disciplinary procedures in such a diplomatic fashion.

Department Decision Process

Any faculty member who feels that a student has committed an academic integrity violation must first confer with that individual in an attempt to resolve the question to the satisfaction of both parties. If it is appropriate, a department chairperson may also be present to affirm an instructor's concerns. Should these measures fail, the dean of the college will schedule a meeting for a face-to-face mediation session.

Face to Face Mediation Hearing

An objective party, known as a mediator, will be assigned to this session. The role of the mediator is to moderate the discussion and assist in resolving the dispute before a formal hearing ensues. The mediator should be concerned with protecting the rights of each party and ensuring that the problem is solved and freely accepted by both parties. Respondents can consult with an advisor before the terms of the resolution are finalized and signed.

In the event that an agreement cannot be reached, or either party wishes to pursue a grievance hearing, a memorandum detailing this mediation failure will be sent to both parties and the appropriate dean.

Formal Grievance Hearing

A hearing gives a respondent a chance to defend themselves. During a hearing, a respondent, complainant, and witnesses will be prompted to testify before the college grievance board. Once all sides are heard, the board will deliberate and come up with a determination of either "responsible" or "not responsible." The hearing will proceed in the following order:

  1. Opening statements
  2. Presentation of grievance, including witnesses and documents
  3. Cross-examination of presenting party
  4. Questions from hearing committee
  5. Presentation of second party to dispute
  6. Cross-examination of second party
  7. Question from hearing committee
  8. Review of evidence
  9. Closing statements
  10. Closed deliberation by hearing committee


Within 14 business days of the mailing action, respondents are entitled the right of appealing the decision of the committee. This appeal must be based on one or more of the following grounds:

  • manifest injustice of the action: burden of proof of such injustice shall rest with the appealing party and must be included in the appeal
  • procedural errors: a violation of the rights of the appealing party must be stated and commented on in the appeal
  • additional evidence: the appealing party must display that substantial additional evidence bearing on the case could not have been properly introduced at the college/division hearing or has been discovered or developed since the time of the hearing, and is crucial to the resolution of the grievance.

New Jersey Student Defense Attorney

An academic misconduct violation can jeopardize your academic and professional career, especially if the violation leads to a suspension or expulsion. If you are a college student who attends a college or university anywhere in the country and are facing these allegations, you need adequate representation. Student defense attorney Joseph D. Lento has dedicated his entire career to helping students in this predicament overcome their charges by prevailing in hearings and other parts of the disciplinary process. He has the skills and expertise to do the same for you. Contact him today.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.