College Academic Misconduct - SUNY at Albany

At the State University of New York, or SUNY Albany, academic honesty is of paramount importance. SUNY is a community of scholars, and each student has a responsibility to promote integrity and truth. Misrepresentations or false scholarship undermine the trust of the academic community and stymy growth and discovery for all students.

As SUNY believes that academic misconduct hurts the value and credibility of the entire institution, it will not hesitate to investigate suspected acts of academic dishonesty and punish students found responsible. If you are accused of violating academic integrity standards at SUNY Albany, you could face consequences that threaten your academic progress.

Consider contacting a student defense attorney-advisor if you find yourself in this situation, as you don't want to risk your entire future.

Academic Misconduct at SUNY Albany

SUNY Albany has a Standards of Academic Integrity Policy that explains what academic integrity is, lists examples of violations, and provides procedures for suspected cases of academic misconduct. Although individual faculty members must include academic integrity information in their syllabi, students must also familiarize themselves with this policy.

Prohibited Behavior

The list of prohibited behavior in the SUNY Albany Standards of Academic Integrity Policy is illustrative, not comprehensive. Students should be aware that any act considered dishonest may result in an accusation of violating the SUNY academic integrity policy.

Examples of prohibited behavior include:

  • Plagiarism: Presenting as one's own work the work of another person, including words, ideas, information, data, evidence, organizing principles, or style of presentation
  • Cheating on exams: Giving or receiving unauthorized help before, during, or after an exam
  • Multiple submissions: Submitting substantial portions of the same work for credit in more than one course without first consulting the instructors
  • Forgery: Imitating someone else's signature on an academic or official document
  • Sabotage: Willfully destroying, damaging, or stealing someone else's work or working materials
  • Unauthorized collaboration: Working with other students on projects, papers, or other academic exercises when the instructor has not allowed it
  • Falsification: Mispresenting material or fabricating information in an academic exercise or assignment
  • Bribery: Offering or giving something of value or service to an instructor with the attempt to receive a grade or other benefits illegitimately
  • Theft, damage, or misuse of library or IT resources: Removing library materials from the library without permission; defacing, damaging, intentionally displacing, or hoarding library materials; violations of the university's Responsible Use of Information Technology Policy

How Does SUNY Albany Handle Academic Misconduct?

At SUNY Albany, academic misconduct cases start with instructors. Faculty members have the responsibility to determine if a student has committed an academic integrity violation. That faculty member may then decide on a penalty that is appropriate to the infraction. Faculty members must submit a Violation of Academic Integrity Report (VAIR) to the Vice Provost for Undergraduate Education.

Contesting a Faculty Decision

Students who disagree with a faculty member's decision concerning academic dishonesty may contest it using their department or school's grievance procedures. Each college or school at the university must have and post grievance procedures for disputing assigned grades or penalties for academic integrity infractions.

If a student is found not responsible for academic misconduct, the penalties do not take effect, and the VAIR is withdrawn. If the grievance process still finds the student responsible or a student admits to the academic integrity infraction, the faculty member may enforce their imposed penalty.

Escalating the Case to a Higher Level

Faculty members have the right to forward a case to Community Standards, but only in two specific cases:

  1. The faculty member finds the infraction merits a failing grade in the course and would like to have the case formally adjudicated.
  2. The faculty member or the college or school dean responsible find the infraction particularly egregious and would like the case formally adjudicated.

If a student is accused of an infraction and it's their second violation, the case is automatically forwarded to Community Standards.

Adjudication with Community Standards

The office of Community Standards at SUNY Albany uses the adjudication procedures in the Community Rights and Responsibilities document. The procedures for dealing with academic integrity violations go as follows:

  • Administrative resolution: An administrative solution only applies when the sanctions will not result in removal from residence, suspension, or dismissal
  • Student conduct hearing: Hearings take place before a student conduct body, and students may have an advisor present with them. Students may present witnesses and ask questions at the hearing
  • Appeals: If the student does not agree with the decision of the student conduct body, they may appeal within seven calendar days of receiving the decision letter. The Dean of Students reviews appeals and recommends a finding to the Provost, who makes a final decision

Potential Sanctions for Academic Misconduct at SUNY Albany

Instructors may impose any one of the following sanctions directly on students they feel have violated the SUNY Standards of Academic Integrity Policy:

  • Warning without further penalty
  • Requirement to redo an assignment without breach of integrity
  • Lowering an assignment grade
  • Assigning a failing grade on an assignment or exam
  • Lowering a course grade
  • Giving a failing grade in the course

If the case goes through the Community Standards office and the student is found responsible for academic misconduct, the potential sanctions include:

  • Revoking scholarship, fellowship, or assistantship
  • Disciplinary probation
  • Suspension
  • Expulsion

Why You Need an Expert Student Defense Attorney-Advisor

If you are accused of an academic integrity violation, you may feel that the instructor or school holds all the power. But as a student, you have rights. An experienced attorney-advisor can help you protect those rights and seek a fair adjudication and sanction.

Attorney Joseph D. Lento has helped hundreds of students in the SUNY system and nationwide with academic misconduct issues and has a thorough knowledge of how university procedures work. If you want to protect your future, contact the Lento Law Firm today by calling 888-535-3686.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.