Lycoming College Title IX Violations

Lycoming College takes instances of sexual misconduct within its student body very seriously. The College upholds a Sexual Misconduct Policy to address such allegations. The policy defines what actions are considered sexual misconduct in the eyes of the College, as well as what actions the College will take against students who are in violation of the policy. The process used for resolving instances of sexual misconduct is similar to that used for resolving incidents of standard misconduct, however, certain special measures may apply due to the serious nature of these allegations.

Lycoming College Sexual Misconduct Process

When the College receives a report of alleged sexual misconduct from a student, authorities will begin the procedure for investigating and resolving the incident. Throughout the process the student who files the report will be known as the "complainant" while the student facing the allegations will be known as the "respondent." Once the report is filed, the College begins its investigation and determines which resolution method best fits the situation. Because of the nature of sexual misconduct hearings, these instances are generally resolved through a Student Conduct Board Hearing.

Student Conduct Board Hearings

The Student Conduct Board will be assembled with members selected for deciding sexual misconduct cases. Once the board is assembled, the hearing process will begin. The board will be led by a chair, who will call hearings to order. Hearings will begin with the parties and witnesses being introduced. The chair will then summarize the results of the investigation into the matters, and review the allegations. The board will then question the complainant, respondent, and witnesses in an order deemed appropriate to the case at hand. The complaint and respondent may not question one another, however, they will have the opportunity to question any witnesses, to an extent deemed appropriate by the chair. Following this stage, both complainant and respondent may make closing statements. Finally, the chair will close the hearing and begin the deliberation phase. Deliberations are to be done using the standard of "a preponderance of evidence."

At hearings for incidents of sexual misconduct, students may be accompanied by an advisor of their own choosing. Allegations of sexual misconduct can carry very serious long-term consequences for a student's academic or professional careers. For this reason, students should select an attorney to serve as their advisor throughout these hearings. An attorney can assist students with methods of witness questioning and proper argument that can greatly influence the outcome of a hearing. An attorney can also make sure that the integrity of the Title IX investigation and disciplinary proceedings is upheld, and that an accused student's rights and interests are protected throughout the process. In addition, should any adverse consequences arise from the reporting of the allegations at Lycoming College, an attorney can serve as a student's legal guide.

Appeals at Lycoming College

In the event of an unfavorable outcome, students are able to make an appeal. Appeals should be submitted within two (2) days of the date on the decision letter. In addition, appeals must be on the grounds of new information, procedural error, or an excessively severe sanction.

If you or your student is facing sexual misconduct allegations or Title IX charges at Lycoming College, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.