College Academic Misconduct – Kansas State University

Getting into college has always been your dream. You've worked hard studying for your exams, joining the clubs and sports that look great on applications, you never expect to be accused of academic misconduct, and if you are, what do you do next? At Kansas State University, accusations of academic integrity violations are taken very seriously so that the university can uphold the rigors of its academic environment. If you or someone you love has been notified that you are under an academic misconduct investigation, the attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm can help present your case in a way that guarantees you the best possible outcome.

Academic Misconduct at Kansas State University

Every university is different on what exactly constitutes academic misconduct. At Kansas State University, academic misconduct is defined as encompassing the following actions:

  • Plagiarism: presenting the words or ideas of another as your own
  • Utilizing materials on exams or in other academic exercises without express permission from the professor
  • Having someone supply questions and answers from the exam or other academic exercise
  • Having another person attempt to take or take an exam or other graded activity for you
  • Consenting to take an exam or perform another graded activity on someone else's behalf
  • Deliberately falsifying laboratory results
  • Revising and resubmitting a quiz or exam for regrading without the professor's permission
  • Facilitating academic dishonesty: intentionally or knowingly helping another student violate the Honor Pledge
  • Altering exams, papers, lab reports, or other academic exercises before or after such materials were handed to the correct person

Kansas State University Academic Dishonesty Procedure

KSU expects each of its faculty, instructors, and students to report violations of the Honor Pledge whenever they believe they have witnessed such an incident. These reports are made to the Honor and Integrity System Director. If the report is made by another student, the Director will consult the faculty member instructing the course and have them fill out a violation Report.

If the faculty member witnesses a violation, they have two options:

  1. Notify the student and impost a sanction that would lower the student's grade on the assignment in some way, or
  2. (a) Conduct their own investigation and identify specific sanctions and then turn it over to the Honor and Integrity System for further investigation or adjudication, or (b) turn it over to the Honor and Integrity System directly.

When the faculty member turns the accusation over to the Honor and Integrity System, the student will be notified. The Honor and Integrity System Case Review Board will review the allegations and make a determination of the sanction (up to an “XF” in the course). If they believe a suspension or expulsion is necessary, they will refer the issue to the Director. Once this report is complete, the alleged violator has the right to review this violation report and contest the accusations within five class days. At this time, the Director will also initiate the investigation and adjudication processes.

The Case Review Board will conduct a formal investigation into the matter and determine if the student is responsible or not and whether any sanctions are warranted. This decision will be made within 15 days of the Case Review Board beginning the investigation. Possible sanctions include anything from a lower letter grade on an assignment or an “XF” in the course to suspension or full expulsion from the university.

Appealing an Academic Misconduct Decision

Students accused of academic misconduct have every right to appeal the decision of the Case Review Board. Appeals must be made within three class days following the written notification of the Board's decision. In some instances, the university may grant an additional three days to make the appeal, but only at the discretion of the Director based on unusual circumstances.

The Director will determine if an appeal is warranted based only on whether there is substantial new information available or a procedural irregularity occurred during the hearing, that might have had an impact on the investigation or adjudication procedure if it had been known prior. The Director will then decide whether to:

  1. Reconvene the Board to consider the new information
  2. Appoint a new Board and perform a new review
  3. Take other action they feel is appropriate given this new information
  4. Deny the appeal

This decision is final and cannot be appealed further.

How an Attorney Advisor Can Help

Academic misconduct accusations can wreak havoc on your college experience and cause long-term consequences that will affect your life going forward. For instance, if you are forced to retake the course you are accused of cheating in, it will prevent you from graduating on time. Additionally, if you are suspended or expelled, those determinations will be memorialized on your transcripts, prompting all graduate schools to inquire into the incident upon your application. And, for students who are adjudicated not responsible for the allegations, the damage to your reputation is not something you can easily recover from. This is why it is so important to work with an attorney-advisor when you receive notice of the accusations. Attorney-advisors, like Attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm, have years of experience helping students across the country who have been accused of violating their university's academic honor code. They work diligently to create a strategic defense that will ensure your case doesn't fall through the cracks. Call 888-535-3686 today to schedule a consultation. The Lento Law Firm can help.

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu