Mercyhurst University

Mercyhurst University uses a Conduct Code to govern its student body. The Code consists of a number of actions a student can take that are prohibited by the University, and the sanctions that are recommended to serve as punishment. The code is upheld by Mercyhurst's Student Conduct System. Students who violate the Code will face hearings, and if found responsible, sanctions.

Hearings will typically follow a process similar to the Title IX process, used for cases involving sexual misconduct, though special procedures are taken during the Title IX process. Once a complaint is filed against a student, an investigation will take place, with either specified University personnel or the University's Title IX coordinator leading it. At hearings the person who is facing charges will be known as the "respondent," while the person or entity pushing the charges forward will be known as the "complainant."

Administrative Hearing

Lower level violations, including Title IX violations that are deemed less severe, can be handled at the level of an Administrative Hearing. The student accused of a violation will have a meeting with a single administrator. At an Administrative Hearing, the complaint or the complainant themselves will make a statement. The hearing officer will then question the complainant, and after this, the complainant will make a closing statement. The respondent will follow the same process. If there are any witnesses they will be presented and questioned by the hearing officers, and if necessary, the investigator will clarify any outstanding issues. The respondent will receive the results and outcome of this hearing in writing.

Hearing Panel

When a violation is of a more destructive nature or is higher-level offense, such as one that would result in expulsion or suspension, a hearing panel will be assembled to hear out and decide upon a case. The flow of a hearing panel meeting will follow the same process as an administrative hearing. The complainant will make a statement, then will be questioned by the hearing panel, and later make a closing statement. The respondent will then do the same. Witnesses will be heard and questioned by the panel, and any outstanding issues will be clarified by the investigator. Finally the panel will follow up with any parties necessary, then close the hearing for deliberations.

At either hearing, students are entitled to the assistance of an attorney at their side. Students with an attorney at their side will receive both a boost in confidence as well as the valuable counsel of a courtroom-tested lawyer. An attorney's counsel can provide helpful insight into methods of making arguments and presenting evidence that can be incredibly effective in a hearing.


In the event of an unfavorable outcome, students can make an appeal within 7 calendar days of their decision letter. The grounds for appeal are a deviation from written procedures, new information, a decision not based on substantive information, or suspicion of bias from the adjudicating authority.

Appeal Hearing

At times, the authority deciding on the appeal may request an appeal hearing with the student. Students can present information, witnesses, and other exhibits at the hearing. Similar to the initial hearing, attorneys are allowed to attend an appeal hearing as well.

If you or your student is currently facing disciplinary action from Mercyhurst University, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.