Notre Dame of Maryland University Title IX Violations

Sexual misconduct allegations are damaging and stressful. It is imperative you are fully aware of your school's processes when facing such allegations. For the purposes of this article, we will provide a brief overview of Notre Dame of Maryland University's Title IX process.

Title IX Process

The university aims to investigate and resolve allegations of sexual misconduct within a 60-day time period. However, this timeline may be extended if necessary.

Filing a complaint

There are certain terms that a Title IX coordinator, school authorities and anyone else involved in these processes will use to characterize you and other parties. An individual who identifies as a victim/survivor will be known as a “complainant.” In some circumstances, a school will take on the role of a complainant. You, a person who has been accused of exhibiting this alleged misconduct will be referred to as a “respondent.”

Notre Dame of Maryland University strongly encourages each member of its campus community to report any actions they've witnessed, heard, or experienced, that could constitute as sexual misconduct to the school. The university has also implemented guidelines that require employees of the school, also known as “responsible employees,” to report a complaint to the school in the event that they hear of any instances of this misconduct. Once a school receives notice of these allegations, the Title IX process will immediately be initiated.

Interim protective measures

When a Title IX coordinator receives word of alleged sexual misconduct, their main concern becomes the safety of a complainant. To prevent the occurrence of retaliation (another serious violation of school policy), the school will impose interim protective measures to keep complainants and respondents separated throughout the course of processes. The following measures may be imposed upon respondents:

  • The implementation of a no contact order (no verbal, electronic, written or third party communication)
  • Changes in work schedule or job assignment
  • Housing arrangements
  • Restrictive access to certain areas of the university etc.

The investigation

If in the complaint and meetings with a complainant, there is reason to proceed with the process, a full on investigation will be conducted. Third party investigators will be appointed to interview all the parties involved and gain a more detailed understanding of what occurred. Based off of all the information they've garnered, the investigators will draft an investigative finding to be sent to a Title IX coordinator. From there, he or she will dictate whether or not a hearing is necessary.

The hearing

A hearing is the last chance for each party to tell their story. A panel will listen to testimony, cross-examinations (in some circumstances) and final statements before deliberating and making a final determination of responsibility.


If a respondent does not agree with a determination or sanction, he or she is granted the option of requesting an appeal. Students have 5 days from receiving notification of the results to file an appeal. The sole grounds of an appeal are:

  • New information that was not previously available has come to light that could have significantly impacted a case outcome
  • The sanction was disproportionate to the severity of the violation
  • Investigators exhibited apparent bias
  • The finding is clearly at odds with the evidence presented etc.

Title IX Advisor

Choosing an attorney to accompany you through Title IX processes is the only way to ensure that your rights are protected and that you truly receive a fair and impartial investigation and hearing. Skilled legal professional Joseph D. Lento is dedicated to helping you defend yourself effectively. Contact him today for help.

Title IX violations and Title IX charges can change an accused student's life if not defended against properly and as early as possible during the disciplinary process, and Joseph D. Lento has nearly a decade of experience passionately fighting for the future of his clients at universities and colleges throughout the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead, prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph Lento is a licensed attorney in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, is admitted as an attorney pro hac vice in state and federal court if needed when representing clients nationwide, and serves as a Title IX advisor to students facing disciplinary cases in Maryland and throughout the nation. Make certain your or your student's interests are protected - Joseph D. Lento can help.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.