If a college or university dismisses a case under Title IX, can a college or university address the allegations in a different manner?

If a college or university dismisses a case under Title IX per the Title IX Final Rule, the school can address the case in a different manner. What that means is misconduct that was misconduct before the Title IX Final Rule went into effect will likely remain misconduct that would be addressed and adjudicated by the school. Since the Title IX Final Rule went into effect, it's just that the school would not be able to do so for Title IX purposes. It would not fall in certain instances under Title IX's jurisdiction.

When that's the case, the Title IX Final Rule allows the school at its discretion to pursue the case otherwise. What schools have done since the Title IX Final Rule has gone into effect is to create a separate policy, a college or university sexual misconduct policy that would be separate or distinct from the Title IX policy where misconduct that falls not under Title IX would be addressed under these new policies. Having an experienced attorney advisor will be your best ally in understanding and navigating the Title IX process and they should be involved from as early as possible in a Title IX case.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu